Evaluation and Countermeasures of the Implementation of Forensic Clinical Identification Standards Based on the Perspective of Accreditation.
10.12116/j.issn.1004-5619.2019.04.017
- Author:
Yan Bin WANG
1
;
Dan Zhou TANG
1
;
Jun Wei GAO
1
;
Ya Hui WANG
2
;
Yao CHEN
2
;
Cheng Tao LI
2
;
Xiao Dan HE
2
Author Information
1. China National Accreditation Service for Conformity Assessment, Beijing 100062, China.
2. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine, Shanghai Forensic Service Platform, Academy of Forensic Science, Shanghai 200063, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
forensic medicine;
expert testimony;
standardization;
certification and accreditation
- MeSH:
Accreditation/legislation & jurisprudence*;
China;
Forensic Sciences/standards*
- From:
Journal of Forensic Medicine
2019;35(4):467-471
- CountryChina
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
The new Standardization Law, implemented in 2018, has added a standard post-implementation evaluation system, aiming to continuously improve the quality of standards through post-implementation evaluation. Standards in the forensic science field are closely related to accreditation activities. Forensic science standards are not only the criteria on which accreditation activities are carried out, but also one of the key contents of the inspection of forensic science institutions in accreditation activities. Since 2018, the certification and accreditation policies in the forensic science field have also been changed, which has brought impacts on the construction of a standard system based on accreditation.This paper analyzes the standard data from China National Accreditation Center from Conformity Assessment on forensic clinical identification accreditation assessment. It points out that the current coverage of laboratory accreditation activities is limited, the development in different provinces is unbalanced, and there is overlap and crossover in the standards in use. It is emphasized that the construction of the national forensic science standardization technical committee, the improvement of the forensic science standard system, the establishment of the standard implementation evaluation index system, and promotion of the coordination of standards, and the certifications and accreditations should be accelerated, in order to continue to promote the standardization and accreditation activities in the field of forensic science.
