Forensic Analysis of 95 Nasal Bone Fracture Cases Caused by Blunt Instrument.
10.3969/j.issn.1004-5619.2016.05.009
- Author:
Yan He YU
1
;
Li Ting LEI
2
;
Chun Zhi YANG
3
Author Information
1. Gutian County Public Security Bureau, Gutian 352200, China.
2. Fujian Shenglan Forensic Judical Appraisal Institute, Fuzhou 350000, China.
3. Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou 350000, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
cases analysis;
forensic medicine;
fractures, bone;
injuries blunt;
nasal bone
- MeSH:
Adult;
Female;
Humans;
Male;
Nasal Bone/injuries*;
Radiography;
Reference Standards;
Sex Factors;
Skull Fractures/diagnostic imaging*;
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
- From:
Journal of Forensic Medicine
2016;32(5):353-355
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVES:To explore the characteristics of nasal bone fracture caused by blunt instrument, including the fracture types, the fracture repair, and the difference of manifestations between X-ray and CT. To provide reference for the identification.
METHODS:The information of basic situation, fracture site, injury manner, diagnosis method, expert opinion of 95 adult nasal fracture cases caused by blunt object, which occurred in Gutian county of Fujian province from January 1999 to December 2013, were analyzed by descriptive statistics. The identification conclusions of different injuries were compared according to new and old standards as well.
RESULTS:There were total 95 adults including 87 male and 8 female. The fracture site and quantity have significant correlation with the nasal bone anatomical relations and the direction and size of the force. Compound fracture was most common. The fracture that could not be determined by X-ray could be clearly diagnosed by CT examination. According to new and old standards, different fracture types have different identification conclusions.
CONCLUSIONS:There are gender differences in nasal bone fracture cases. Larger external force is easy to cause compound fracture. CT examination is significantly better than X-ray examination.
