Risk factors for residual cancer or lymph node metastasis after endoscopic noncurable resection of early colorectal cancer.
10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20210126-00082
- Author:
Xin ZHAO
1
;
Li Zhou DOU
1
;
Yue Ming ZHANG
1
;
Yong LIU
1
;
Shun HE
1
;
Yan KE
1
;
Xu Dong LIU
1
;
Yu Meng LIU
1
;
Hai Rui WU
1
;
Zheng Qi LI
1
;
Zhi Hao CHEN
1
;
Gui Qi WANG
1
Author Information
1. Department of Endoscopy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Colorectal neoplasms;
Non-curative resection;
Residual cancer or lymph node metastasis;
Risk factors
- MeSH:
Humans;
Lymphatic Metastasis;
Neoplasm, Residual;
Retrospective Studies;
Endoscopy;
Risk Factors;
Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology*;
Neoplasm Invasiveness
- From:
Chinese Journal of Oncology
2023;45(4):335-339
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective: Risk factors related to residual cancer or lymph node metastasis after endoscopic non-curative resection of early colorectal cancer were analyzed to predict the risk of residual cancer or lymph node metastasis, optimize the indications of radical surgical surgery, and avoid excessive additional surgical operations. Methods: Clinical data of 81 patients who received endoscopic treatment for early colorectal cancer in the Department of Endoscopy, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from 2009 to 2019 and received additional radical surgical surgery after endoscopic resection with pathological indication of non-curative resection were collected to analyze the relationship between various factors and the risk of residual cancer or lymph node metastasis after endoscopic resection. Results: Of the 81 patients, 17 (21.0%) were positive for residual cancer or lymph node metastasis, while 64 (79.0%) were negative. Among 17 patients with residual cancer or positive lymph node metastasis, 3 patients had only residual cancer (2 patients with positive vertical cutting edge). 11 patients had only lymph node metastasis, and 3 patients had both residual cancer and lymph node metastasis. Lesion location, poorly differentiated cancer, depth of submucosal invasion ≥2 000 μm, venous invasion were associated with residual cancer or lymph node metastasis after endoscopic (P<0.05). Logistic multivariate regression analysis showed that poorly differentiated cancer (OR=5.513, 95% CI: 1.423, 21.352, P=0.013) was an independent risk factor for residual cancer or lymph node metastasis after endoscopic non-curative resection of early colorectal cancer. Conclusions: For early colorectal cancer after endoscopic non-curable resection, residual cancer or lymph node metastasis is associated with poorly differentiated cancer, depth of submucosal invasion ≥2 000 μm, venous invasion and the lesions are located in the descending colon, transverse colon, ascending colon and cecum with the postoperative mucosal pathology result. For early colorectal cancer, poorly differentiated cancer is an independent risk factor for residual cancer or lymph node metastasis after endoscopic non-curative resection, which is suggested that radical surgery should be added after endoscopic treatment.
