Comparison of Three Methods for Skeleton Age Estimation.
10.12116/j.issn.1004-5619.2021.410703
- Author:
Dong-Chuan ZHANG
1
;
Geng FEI
2
;
Ting-Ting CHEN
1
;
Lu-Yi XU
1
;
De-Lun YU
1
;
Tian-Ye ZHANG
1
Author Information
1. Institute of Forensic Science, Shanghai Public Security Bureau, Shanghai Key laboratory of Crime Scene Evidence, Shanghai 200083, China.
2. Shanghai Police College, Shanghai 200137, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
age estimation by skeleton;
costal cartilage;
forensic anthropology;
pubic symphysis;
sternum
- MeSH:
Adult;
Age Determination by Skeleton/methods*;
Child, Preschool;
China;
Female;
Forensic Anthropology/methods*;
Forensic Medicine;
Humans;
Infant;
Male;
Pubic Symphysis/anatomy & histology*
- From:
Journal of Forensic Medicine
2022;38(3):319-323
- CountryChina
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVES:To find the appropriate method for age estimation for different ages and sexes.
METHODS:The costal cartilage, sternum and pubic symphysis of 91 unknowns from 2000 to 2020 from the Forensic Department of the Criminal Investigation Team of Shanghai Public Security Bureau were collected. Costal cartilage, sternal and pubic symphysis inferences were used to estimate the age, and the consistency between the estimated results and the actual physiological age of the unknowns was tested. The accuracy of age estimation of different samples was compared, and the relationship between accuracy and age and sex was analyzed.
RESULTS:Using the costal cartilage method, the inference errors of males, females and the whole population under 40 years old were (0.608±2.298) years, (0.429±1.867) years and (0.493±2.040) years, while those over 40 years old were (-1.707±3.770) years, (-3.286±4.078) years and (-2.625±4.029) years. The differences between different age groups in these three populations were statistically significant (P<0.05). Using the sternum method, the inference errors of males and females under the age of 40 were (0.921±3.019) years and (0.452±1.451) years, while those over the age of 40 were (-5.903±5.088) years and (-1.429±2.227) years. The differences between different age groups in males and females were statistically significant (P<0.05). Using the pubic symphysis method, the inference errors of males and females under 40 years old were (-0.204±1.876) years and (0.238±2.477) years, while those over 40 years old were (1.500±2.156) years and (-2.643±4.270) years. The differences between different age groups in males and females were statistically significant (P<0.05). Using the sternum method and pubic symphysis method for age estimation of over 40 years old, the difference between different sexes was statistically significant (P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS:All three methods of age estimation are stable and effective and more accurate for people under 40 years old. For age estimation of unknowns over 40 years old, the pubic symphysis method is preferred in males and the sternum method is preferred in females.
