Progress in standard assessment on competency to stand trial of mentally disordered offenders.
- Author:
Xiao-Bing CHEN
1
;
Wei-Xiong CAI
Author Information
1. Department of Forensic Medicine, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China. icygreenbing@hotmail.com
- Publication Type:Review
- MeSH:
Crime/psychology*;
Criminal Law/legislation & jurisprudence*;
Criminals/psychology*;
Forensic Psychiatry/standards*;
Humans;
Insanity Defense;
Mental Competency/psychology*;
Mental Disorders/psychology*;
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales;
Psychological Tests;
Reference Standards;
Reproducibility of Results;
Surveys and Questionnaires
- From:
Journal of Forensic Medicine
2012;28(4):293-298
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Competency to stand trial relates directly to legal rights of the appraised individual as well as whether criminal procedure can be carried out smoothly. Foreign scholars have conducted a large number of theoretical researches, and developed a series of standardized evaluation tools. However, the assessment on competency to stand trial has mainly focused on medical criteria in China for a long time, and most cases were judged by forensic psychiatrists' experience. Recently, Chinese scholars have started the initial research on standardized evaluation. This paper reviews the notion of competency to stand trial, the evaluation criteria, and the assessment tools domestically and abroad. The main focus is on foreign assessment tools, which included three categories. First category includes checklist, self-report questionnaires and sentence-completion tasks. Second category is the interview-based instruments without criterion-based scoring. Last category is the interview-based instruments with criterion-based scoring. This literature may be helpful for further research and standardization on assessment tools of competency to stand trial of mentally disordered offenders.
