The application of evaluation tools for criminal responsibility in forensic psychiatric expertise.
- Author:
Pei-Xin FU
1
;
Jing WANG
;
Tian-Tao SHI
;
Ji-Nian HU
;
Ming-Xia ZHU
Author Information
1. Beijing Ankang Hospital, Beijing 101300, China. fpx76@yahoo.com.cn
- Publication Type:Review
- MeSH:
Crime/psychology*;
Expert Testimony/legislation & jurisprudence*;
Forensic Psychiatry;
Humans;
Liability, Legal;
Mental Competency;
Mental Disorders/psychology*;
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales;
Social Responsibility
- From:
Journal of Forensic Medicine
2010;26(3):210-213
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Criminal responsibility is divided into three types: full criminal responsibility, diminished criminal responsibility and criminal irresponsibility in China. In forensic psychiatric expertise, doctors often have different opinions about the responsibility in a given case because of lacking objective criteria. The evaluation of criminal responsibility is always unresolved problem in forensic psychiatric expertise. Application of these evaluation tools in forensic psychiatric expertise were reviewed in this article. The value of the tools were still controversial in the reliability and validity, but it is clear that these tools have the positive roles in ensuring the standardization and the uniformity of the forensic investigation.
