Study on consistency of assessed results according to the Standard of Evaluated Injured Severity.
- Author:
Xin LIU
1
;
Jin-xiang PENG
;
Lin CHANG
Author Information
1. Beijing Institute of Forensic Medicine and Science, Beijing 100040. lxx8181@sina.com
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Analysis of Variance;
Education, Professional;
Employee Performance Appraisal/standards*;
Forensic Medicine/standards*;
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice;
Health Personnel/standards*;
Humans;
Reproducibility of Results;
Trauma Severity Indices
- From:
Journal of Forensic Medicine
2002;18(2):82-85
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To explore the consistency of assessed results according to Standard of Evaluated Injured Severity, finding out some factors that influenced appraisal conclusion.
METHODS:102 cases examined by Beijing Institute of Forensic Medicine and Science in 1998 were re-evaluated respectively by nine appraisers.
RESULTS:The results showed that distinction of appraisal conclusion between appraisers in the same institute was small, but in different institute was big. The work experience and professional train were important to reduce errors.
CONCLUSION:Standard of Evaluated Injured Severity strong take on character of profession. Veracity of assessed injured severity is related with unitive authoritative explanation, training and experience of appraiser.
