Analysis of rehabilitation effects of cochlear implantation in elderly patients with prelingual deafness.
10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2023.06.014
- Author:
Haijuan WU
1
;
Tongli LI
2
;
Guodong LI
2
;
Jingjing HUO
2
Author Information
1. The Fifth Clinical Medical College of Shanxi Medical University，Taiyuan，030001，China.
2. Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery，Fifth Hospital of Shanxi Medical University.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
auditory and speech rehabilitation;
cochlear implantation;
prelingually elderly;
speech basis
- MeSH:
Humans;
Aged;
Cochlear Implantation/methods*;
Cochlear Implants;
Speech Perception;
Deafness/rehabilitation*;
Hearing Tests;
Speech Intelligibility;
Treatment Outcome
- From:
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
2023;37(6):478-482
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:The auditory and speech rehabilitation effects were assessed by the Categories of Auditory Performance（CAP） and the speech intelligibility rating scale（SIR） after cochlear implantation（CI） in prelingually elderly patients by telephone follow-up or face-to-face conversation. Methods:The clinical data of the prelingually deaf patients who underwent unilateral CI in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Shanxi People's Hospital, from December 2016 to December 2021 were collected. Thirty-eight patients were divided into Group A（SIR 1, 17 cases）, Group B（SIR 2, 10 cases） and Group C（SIR 3, 11 cases） according to the preoperative SIR Score. Nineteen patients with post-lingual hearing impairment were selected as the control group（Group D, 19 cases）. The effects of hearing and speech rehabilitation were evaluated using CAP and SIR Scores before surgery, 6 months after startup, and 1 year after startup. Results:There were no significant differences in CAP scores among the three groups of patients with prelingually deaf patients at 6 months and 1 year after startup（P>0.05）, but there were significant differences between group A and group D at 6 months and 1 year after startup（P<0.05）; the SIR Score of group A had statistical difference before surgery and 6 months after startup（P<0.05）, group B had statistical difference before surgery and 1 year after startup（P<0.05）, and group C and D had no statistical difference before surgery and 6 months and 1 year after startup, respectively（P>0.05）. Conclusion:For the prelingually deaf elderly patients, hearing will develop rapidly 6 months after startup, and the effect of postoperative auditory rehabilitation was positively correlated with the preoperative speech ability. In the aspect of speech, the prelingually dear elderly patients who have poor preoperative speech ability could benefit more from CI early after surgery. CI is not contraindicated in prelingually deaf elderly patients, even those with poor preoperative speech function.
