Evaluation of subjective scale in allergen nasal provocation test.
10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2023.06.004
- Author:
Li SHEN
1
;
Xiuxiu HU
2
;
Liang ZENG
1
;
Yuanhua LIU
1
;
Ying WU
1
;
Huarong YI
1
;
Qing LUO
1
;
Jing YE
1
Author Information
1. Department of Otolaryngology，Head and Neck Surgery，First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University，Nanchang，330006，China.
2. Department of Pediatrics，Jiangxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Lebel scale;
active anterior rhinomanometry;
nasal allergen provocation test;
subjective scale;
total nasal symptom score;
visual analog scoring
- MeSH:
Animals;
Humans;
Allergens;
Nasal Provocation Tests/methods*;
Rhinitis, Allergic/diagnosis*;
Nose;
Pyroglyphidae
- From:
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
2023;37(6):423-427
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the clinical value of visual analogue scale （VAS）, Lebel scale and total nasal symptom scores （TNSS） in evaluating nasal allergen provocation test （NAPT）. Methods:A total of 151 patients suspected of allergic rhinitis admitted to the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery of our hospital from April 2020 to September 2020 were included, of which 76 were positive for house dust mites and 75 were negative for allergens. Nasal airway resistance（NAR） was measured by active anterior nasal manometry. Nasal symptoms were evaluated by VAS, Lebel and TNSS. House dust mite allergen was used for NAPT by spray method. An increase≥40% in NAR was used as the gold standard for objective evaluation of NAPT. ROC curves of VAS, Lebel and TNSS were drawn to compare the evaluation effectiveness of different subjective evaluation methods, and the optimal critical point of each ROC curve was obtained. Results:With NAR increased by ≥40% as the gold standard, the area under ROC curve of VAS was 0.884, and the sensitivity and specificity were 97.75% and 80.65%, respectively. The area under ROC curve of Lebel was 0.773, and the sensitivity and specificity were 68.54% and 75.81%, respectively. The area under ROC curve of TNSS was 0.792, and the sensitivity and specificity were 68.54% and 79.03%, respectively. There was no significant difference between Lebel and TNSS（P>0.05）. The VAS differed significantly from Lebel and TNSS（P<0.05）. The Kappa values of VAS, Lebel, TNSS and NAR were 0.803, 0.432 and 0.459, respectively. Conclusion:The VAS, Lebel, TNSS subjective scale and NAR are consistent in evaluating the efficacy of NAPT, with the VAS assessment showing highest consistency with NAR. As objective assessment instruments are not widely used in China, subjective assessment method could be adopted to evaluate the efficacy of NAPT in clinical practice, and VAS scale is recommended as a priority.
