Analysis of clinical phenotype and genetic variants among four Chinese pedigrees affected with Waardenburg syndrome.
10.3760/cma.j.cn511374-20220727-00498
- VernacularTitle:Waardenburg综合征4个家系的临床表型与基因变异分析
- Author:
Lulu WANG
1
;
Lu MAO
;
Hongen XU
;
Shuping SUN
;
Bin ZUO
;
Wei LU
Author Information
1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450052, China. luwei611@zzu.edu.cn.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Female;
Humans;
Male;
Deafness;
East Asian People;
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/genetics*;
Mutation;
Pedigree;
Phenotype;
Waardenburg Syndrome/diagnosis*
- From:
Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics
2023;40(6):661-667
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To explore the genetic basis for four Chinese pedigrees affected with Waardenburg syndrome (WS).
METHODS:Four WS probands and their pedigree members who had presented at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between July 2021 and March 2022 were selected as the study subjects. Proband 1, a 2-year-and-11-month female, had blurred speech for over 2 years. Proband 2, a 10-year-old female, had bilateral hearing loss for 8 years. Proband 3, a 28-year-old male, had right side hearing loss for over 10 years. Proband 4, a 2-year-old male, had left side hearing loss for one year. Clinical data of the four probands and their pedigree members were collected, and auxiliary examinations were carried out. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples and subjected to whole exome sequencing. Candidate variants were verified by Sanger sequencing.
RESULTS:Proband 1, with profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, blue iris and dystopia canthorum, was found to have harbored a heterozygous c.667C>T (p.Arg223Ter) nonsense variant of the PAX3 gene, which was inherited from her father. Based on the guidelines from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG), the variant was classified as pathogenic (PVS1+PM2_Supporting+PP4), and the proband was diagnosed with WS type I. Proband 2, with moderate sensorineural hearing loss on the right side and severe sensorineural hearing loss on the left side, has harbored a heterozygous frameshifting c.1018_1022del (p.Val340SerfsTer60) variant of the SOX10 gene. Neither of her parents has harbored the same variant. Based on the ACMG guidelines, it was classified as pathogenic (PVS1+PM2_Supporting+PP4+PM6), and the proband was diagnosed with WS type II. Proband 3, with profound sensorineural hearing loss on the right side, has harbored a heterozygous c.23delC (p.Ser8TrpfsTer5) frameshifting variant of the SOX10 gene. Based on the ACMG guidelines, it was classified as pathogenic (PVS1+PM2_Supporting+PP4), and the proband was diagnosed with WS type II. Proband 4, with profound sensorineural hearing loss on the left side, has harbored a heterozygous c.7G>T (p.Glu3Ter) nonsense variant of the MITF gene which was inherited from his mother. Based on the ACMG guidelines, the variant was classified as pathogenic (PVS1+PM2_Supporting+PP4), and the proband was diagnosed with WS type II.
CONCLUSION:By genetic testing, the four probands were all diagnosed with WS. Above finding has facilitated molecular diagnosis and genetic counseling for their pedigrees.
