Comparison of efficacy of platelet-rich plasma and extracorporeal shock wave for the treatment of chronic insertional Achilles tendinopathy.
10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2023.04.011
- Author:
Wen-Bo BAI
1
,
2
;
Xiao-Jun LIANG
3
;
Hong-Mou ZHAO
3
;
Xin-Wen WANG
3
;
Liang LIU
3
;
Jing-Qi LIANG
3
;
Chao SHI
3
;
Jun LU
3
Author Information
1. Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang 712046, Shaanxi, China
2. Foot and Ankle Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710054, Shaanxi, China.
3. Foot and Ankle Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710054, Shaanxi, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Chronic insertional Achilles tendinopathy;
Extracorporeal shock wave;
Platelet-rich plasma
- MeSH:
Male;
Female;
Humans;
Middle Aged;
Achilles Tendon;
Tendinopathy/therapy*;
Treatment Outcome;
Exercise Therapy;
Platelet-Rich Plasma
- From:
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
2023;36(4):351-356
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To compare clinical efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and extracorporeal shock wave in treating chronic insertional Achilles tendinopathy.
METHODS:From February 2019 to August 2021, 42 patients with chronic insertional Achilles tendinopathy were selected and divided into PRP group(20 patients, 28 feet) and shock wave group (22 patients, 29 feet). In PRP group, there were 12 males and 8 females, aged 47.00(28.00, 50.75) years old, and the courses of disease ranged 7.00(6.00, 7.00) months;PRP injection was performed in the Achilles tendon stop area of the affected side. In shock wave group, there were 16 males and 6 females, aged 42.00(35.75, 47.25) years old;and the courses of disease was 7.00(6.00, 8.00) months;shock wave was performed in Achilles tendon stop area of the affected side and triceps surae area. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A) were applied to evaluate clnical effect before treatment, 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment, and satisfaction of patients was investigated.
RESULTS:VAS and VISA-A score in both groups were significantly improved at 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment than before treatment (P<0.05), VAS and VISA-A score in PRP group at 6 months after treatment were significantly higher than those at 1 and 3 months after treatment, and VAS and VISA-A score in shock wave group were lower than those at 1 and 3 months after treatment (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in VAS and VISA-A score between two groups before treatment, 1 and 3 months after treatment(P>0.05), while VAS and VISA-A score in PRP group were better than those in shock wave group at 6 months after treatment(P<0.05), and the satisfaction survey in PRP group was better than that in shock wave group(P<0.05).
CONCLUSION:PRP injection has a good clinical effect on chronic insertional Achilles tendinopathy with high patient satisfaction, and medium-and long-term effect of PRP injection for the treatment of chronic insertional Achilles tendinopathy is better than that of extracorporeal divergent shock wave.
