Early-effectiveness of unilateral biportal endoscopic laminectomy in treatment of two-level lumbar spinal stenosis.
10.7507/1002-1892.202302014
- Author:
Yuhong ZHANG
1
;
Bo FENG
2
;
Weiliang SU
1
;
Dong LIU
3
;
Peng HU
1
;
Huaiwang LU
1
;
Xiaopeng GENG
1
Author Information
1. Department of Spinal Surgery, Binzhou Medical University Hospital, Binzhou Shandong, 256603, P. R. China.
2. Department of Neurology, Binzhou Medical University Hospital, Binzhou Shandong, 256603, P. R. China.
3. Department of Traumatic Orthopedics, Binzhou Medical University Hospital, Binzhou Shandong, 256603, P. R. China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Unilateral biportal endoscopy technique;
decompression;
effectiveness;
lumbar spinal stenosis
- MeSH:
Male;
Female;
Humans;
Middle Aged;
Laminectomy;
Spinal Stenosis/surgery*;
Constriction, Pathologic/surgery*;
Low Back Pain;
Retrospective Studies;
Blood Loss, Surgical;
Endoscopy;
Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery*;
Spinal Fusion/methods*;
Decompression, Surgical;
Surgical Wound/surgery*;
Treatment Outcome
- From:
Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery
2023;37(6):706-712
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To analyze the early effectiveness of unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) laminectomy in the treatment of two-level lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).
METHODS:The clinical data of 98 patients with two-level LSS treated with UBE between September 2020 and December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 53 males and 45 females with an average age of 59.9 years (range, 32-79 years). Among them, there were 56 cases of mixed spinal stenosis, 23 cases of central spinal canal stenosis, and 19 cases of nerve root canal stenosis. The duration of symptoms was 1.5- 10 years, with an average of 5.4 years. The operative segments were L 2, 3 and L 3, 4 in 2 cases, L 3, 4 and L 4, 5 in 29 cases, L 4, 5 and L 5, S 1 in 67 cases. All patients had different degrees of low back pain, among of which 76 cases were with unilateral lower extremity symptoms and 22 cases were with bilateral lower extremity symptoms. There were 29 cases of bilateral decompression in both segments, 63 cases of unilateral decompression in both segments, and 6 cases of unilateral decompression and bilateral decompression of each segment. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, total incision length, hospitalization stay, ambulation time, and related complications were recorded. Visual analogue scale (VAS) score was used to assess the low back and leg pain before operation and at 3 days, 3 months after operation, and at last follow-up. The Oswestry disability index (ODI) was used to evaluate the functional recovery of lumbar spine before operation and at 3 months and last follow-up after operation. Modified MacNab criteria was used to evaluate clinical outcomes at last follow-up. Imaging examinations were performed before and after operation to measure the preservation rate of articular process, modified Pfirrmann scale, disc height (DH), lumbar lordosis angle (LLA), and cross-sectional area of the canal (CAC), and the CAC improvement rate was calculated.
RESULTS:All patients underwent surgery successfully. The operation time was (106.7±25.1) minutes, the intraoperative blood loss was (67.7±14.2) mL, and the total incision length was (3.2±0.4) cm. The hospitalization stay was 8 (7, 9) days, and the ambulation time was 3 (3, 4) days. All the wounds healed by first intention. Dural tear occurred in 1 case during operation, and mild headache occurred in 1 case after operation. All patients were followed up 13-28 months with an average of 19.3 months, and there was no recurrence or reoperation during the follow-up. At last follow-up, the preservation rate of articular process was 84.7%±7.3%. The modified Pfirrmann scale and DH were significantly different from those before operation ( P<0.05), while the LLA was not significantly different from that before operation ( P=0.050). The CAC significantly improved ( P<0.05), and the CAC improvement rate was 108.1%±17.8%. The VAS scores of low back pain and leg pain and ODI at each time point after operation significantly improved when compared with those before operation, and the differences between each time points were significant ( P<0.05). According to the modified MacNab criteria, 63 cases were excellent, 25 cases were good, and 10 cases were fair, with an excellent and good rate of 89.8%.
CONCLUSION:UBE laminectomy is a safe and effective technique with little trauma and fast recovery for two-level LSS and the early effectiveness is satisfactory.
