A comparative study of absorbable screw fixation and absorbable screw combined with suture anchor fixation in treatment of avulsion fracture of posterior cruciate ligament at tibial insertion of knee joint.
10.7507/1002-1892.202301061
- Author:
Shuang WU
1
;
Kaibo ZHANG
1
;
Weili FU
1
;
Jian LI
1
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopedics, Insititute of Orthopedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Posterior cruciate ligament;
absorbable screw;
anchor;
avulsion fracture;
internal fixation
- MeSH:
Humans;
Posterior Cruciate Ligament/injuries*;
Suture Anchors;
Fractures, Avulsion/surgery*;
Retrospective Studies;
Tibial Fractures/surgery*;
Arthroscopy/methods*;
Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods*;
Knee Joint/surgery*;
Bone Screws;
Suture Techniques;
Treatment Outcome
- From:
Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery
2023;37(5):572-577
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To compare the effectiveness of open reduction of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) avulsion fracture at tibial insertion of knee joint with absorbable screws fixation and absorbable screw combined with suture anchor fixation.
METHODS:The clinical data of 26 patients with PCL avulsion fracture at tibial insertion who met the selection criteria between March 2015 and October 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 14 patients were fixed with simple absorbable screw (group A), and 12 patients were fixed with absorbable screw combined with suture anchors (group B). All patients were confirmed by X-ray film, CT, or MRI preoperatively, and got positive results in preoperative posterior drawer tests. There was no significant difference in gender, age, side of affected limb, time from injury to operation, comorbidities, and preoperative Meyers & McKeever classification, Lysholm score, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score between the two groups ( P>0.05). The operation time and postoperative complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. At last follow-up, Lysholm score and IKDC score were used to evaluate the improvement of knee function.
RESULTS:There was no significant difference in operation time between the two groups ( P>0.05). All incisions healed by first intention, and no complication such as vascular and nerve injury or venous thrombosis occurred. All 26 patients were followed up 9-89 months, with an average of 55.3 months. The follow-up time of group A and group B was (55.7±23.2) and (56.8±29.3) months, respectively, with no significant difference ( t=-0.106, P=0.916). Radiographs showed bone healing in both groups at 3 months after operation, and no complication such as infection and traumatic arthritis occurred. At last follow-up, the posterior drawer test was negative in both groups, and the Lysholm score and IKDC score significantly improved when compared with the pre-operative values ( P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the improvement value between the two groups ( P>0.05).
CONCLUSION:For PCL avulsion fracture at tibial insertion of the knee joint, the open reduction and absorbable screw combined with suture anchor fixation can achieve reliable fracture reduction and fixation, which is conducive to the early rehabilitation and functional exercise, and the postoperative functional recovery of the knee joint is satisfactory.
