Clinical application of Fastpass Scorpion suture passer for arthroscopic Bankart repair.
10.7507/1002-1892.202301046
- Author:
Wuyuan ZHENG
1
;
Jiapeng ZHENG
2
;
Dasheng LIN
2
;
Yibo XIE
1
;
Weikai XU
1
;
Qingquan WU
2
;
Qi XIAO
2
;
Huiyun DENG
2
;
Huixiang JIANG
2
;
Guodong FENG
2
Author Information
1. Department of Joint Surgery, the Marine Corps Hospital of Chinese PLA, Chaozhou Guangdong, 521000, P. R. China.
2. Orthopaedic Center of Chinese PLA, the 909th Hospital of Chinese PLA (Southeast Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University), Zhangzhou Fujian, 363000, P. R. China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Bankart repair;
Fastpass Scorpion suture passer;
arthroscopy;
inferior capsulolabral complex;
suture shuttle
- MeSH:
Humans;
Animals;
Arthroscopy/methods*;
Scorpions;
Retrospective Studies;
Treatment Outcome;
Shoulder Dislocation/surgery*;
Sutures;
Equidae;
Shoulder Joint/surgery*;
Joint Instability/surgery*;
Suture Anchors;
Recurrence;
Range of Motion, Articular
- From:
Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery
2023;37(5):538-544
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To explore the effectiveness and advantages of using Fastpass Scorpion suture passer to stitch the inferior capsulolabral complex in arthroscopic Bankart repair compared with traditional arthroscopic suture shuttle.
METHODS:The clinical data of 41 patients with Bankart lesion, who met the selection criteria and were admitted between August 2019 and October 2021, was retrospectively analyzed. Under arthroscopy, the inferior capsulolabral complex was stitched with Fastpass Scorpion suture passer in 27 patients (FS group) and with arthroscopic suture shuttle in 14 patients (ASS group). There was no significant difference between the two groups ( P>0.05) in gender, age, injured side, frequency of shoulder dislocation, time from first dislocation to operation, and preoperative Rowe score of shoulder. Taking successful suture and pull-tightening as the criteria for completion of repair, the number of patients that were repaired at 5∶00 to 6∶00 (<6:00) and 6∶00 to 7∶00 positions of the glenoid in the two groups was compared. The operation time, and the difference of Rowe shoulder score betwee pre- and post-operation, the occurrence of shoulder joint dislocation, the results of apprehension test, and the constituent ratio of recovery to the pre-injury movement level between the two groups at 1 year after operation.
RESULTS:Both groups completed the repair at 5∶00 to 6∶00 (<6∶00), and the constituent ratio of patients completed at 6∶00 to 7∶00 was significantly greater in the FS group than in the ASS group ( P<0.05). The operation time was significantly shorter in the FS group than in the ASS group ( P<0.05). All incisions in the two groups healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 12-36 months (mean, 19.1 months). No anchor displacement or neurovascular injury occurred during follow-up. Rowe score of shoulder in the two groups significantly improved at 1 year after operation than preoperative scores ( P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in the difference of Rowe shoulder score between pre- and post-operation between the two groups ( P>0.05). At 1 year after operation, no re-dislocation occurred, and there was no significant difference in the apprehension test and the constituent ratio of recovery to the pre-injury movement level between the two groups ( P>0.05).
CONCLUSION:Compared with the arthroscopic suture shuttle, using Fastpass Scorpion suture passer to stitch the inferior capsulolabral complex in arthroscopic Bankart repair is more convenient, saves operation time, and has good effectiveness.
