Progress in evaluation of return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
10.7507/1002-1892.202301029
- Author:
Zhengliang SHI
1
;
Yanlin LI
1
;
Yang YU
1
;
Guoliang WANG
1
;
Ziwen NING
1
;
Renjie HE
1
;
Wenting TANG
1
;
Kun WANG
1
Author Information
1. Department of Sports Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming Yunnan, 650032, P. R. China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction;
evaluation method;
return to sport
- MeSH:
Humans;
Return to Sport/psychology*;
Reinjuries/surgery*;
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery*;
Lower Extremity/surgery*;
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/methods*
- From:
Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery
2023;37(4):495-501
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To summarize the evaluation methods of return to sports (RTS) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in recent years, in order to provide reference for clinical practice.
METHODS:The literature related to the RTS after ACLR was searched from CNKI, Wanfang, PubMed, and Foreign Medical Information Resources Retrieval Platform (FMRS) databases. The retrieval range was from 2010 to 2023, and 66 papers were finally included for review. The relevant literature was summarized and analyzed from the aspects of RTS time, objective evaluation indicators, and psychological evaluation.
RESULTS:RTS is the common desire of patients with ACL injury and doctors, as well as the initial intention of selecting surgery. A reasonable and perfect evaluation method of RTS can not only help patients recover to preoperative exercise level, but also protect patients from re-injury. At present, the main criterion for clinical judgement of RTS is time. It is basically agreed that RTS after 9 months can reduce the re-injury. In addition to time, it is also necessary to test the lower limb muscle strength, jumping, balance, and other aspects of the patient, comprehensively assess the degree of functional recovery and determine the different time of RTS according to the type of exercise. Psychological assessment plays an important role in RTS and has a good clinical predictive effect.
CONCLUSION:RTS is one of the research hotspots after ACLR. At present, there are many related evaluation methods, which need to be further optimized by more research to build a comprehensive and standardized evaluation system.
