Effectiveness of arthroscopic "hybrid" suture for delaminated rotator cuff tear: A prospective randomized controlled study.
10.7507/1002-1892.202301034
- Author:
Zhichao CHEN
1
;
Zhiwei ZHANG
1
;
Xie JIANG
1
;
Yu DAN
1
;
Zuchao GU
1
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopedics, Chengdu First People's Hospital, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Ratator cuff tear;
delaminated tear;
en masse suture;
“hybrid” suture
- MeSH:
Humans;
Rotator Cuff Injuries/surgery*;
Prospective Studies;
Shoulder Joint/surgery*;
Treatment Outcome;
Arthroscopy/methods*;
Sutures;
Range of Motion, Articular;
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- From:
Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery
2023;37(4):398-403
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To investigate the effectiveness of "hybrid" suture with en masse combined with double-layer repair under arthroscopy in repair of delaminated rotator cuff tear by comparison with en masse suture.
METHODS:Fifty-six patients with delaminated rotator cuff tears met selection criteria between June 2020 and January 2022 were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups ( n=28) using a random number method. The patients in trial group underwent arthroscopic "hybrid" suture with the combination en masse and double-layer suture. The patients in control group underwent en masse suture under arthroscopy. There was no significant difference between the two groups ( P>0.05) in terms of gender, age, rotator cuff tear side, tear size, cause of injury, disease duration, and preoperative American Association of Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder scoring, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and shoulder range of motion (forward flexion and lateral external rotation). The operation time, the difference of ASES score, UCLA score, VAS score, and shoulder range of motion (forward flexion and lateral external rotation) between pre- and post-operation were recorded and compared between the two groups ( P>0.05). The rotator cuff healing was examined by MRI and evaluated based on the classification criteria of rotator cuff healing proposed by Sugaya et al.
RESULTS:Three cases (1 case in the trial group and 2 cases in the control group) were excluded from the study due to loss of follow-up. Twenty-seven cases in the trial group and 26 cases in the control group were included in the final study analysis. All operations of the two groups were completed successfully. There was no significant difference in the operation time between groups ( P>0.05). The follow-up time was 10-12 months (mean, 10.9 months) in the trial group and 10-13 months (mean, 11.4 months) in the control group. All incisions healed by first intention. No surgery-related complications occurred. The UCLA score, ASES score, VAS score, and shoulder range of motion (forward flexion and lateral external rotation) of both groups at 9 months after operation were significantly superior to those before operation ( P<0.05). The difference of UCLA score, ASES score, and VAS score between before and after operation in the trial group were significantly better than those in the control group ( P<0.05). There was no significant differences between the two groups in the difference of shoulder range of motion (forward flexion and lateral lateral rotation) ( P>0.05). At 9 months after operation, according to the classification criteria of rotator cuff healing proposed by Sugaya et al, MRI showed that the rotator cuff healing of the trial group was significantly better than that of the control group ( P<0.05).
CONCLUSION:Compared with en masse suture, arthroscopic "hybrid" suture for the repair of delaminated rotator cuff tear has advantages in relieving pain and improving shoulder joint function, and the rotator cuff healing is better.
