Musculoskeletal multibody dynamics investigation for the different medial-lateral installation position of the femoral component in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
10.7507/1001-5515.202209001
- Author:
Jiaxuan REN
1
;
Zhenxian CHEN
1
;
Jing ZHANG
1
;
Yongchang GAO
1
;
Feng QIAO
2
;
Zhongmin JIN
3
Author Information
1. School of Construction Machinery, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, P. R. China.
2. Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710054, P. R. China.
3. School of Mechanical Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, P. R. China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Joint contact force;
Joint movement;
Ligament force;
Medial-lateral installation position;
Musculoskeletal multibody dynamics;
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
- MeSH:
Humans;
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee;
Knee Joint/surgery*;
Knee Prosthesis;
Gait;
Rotation
- From:
Journal of Biomedical Engineering
2023;40(3):508-514
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
The surgical installation accuracy of the components in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an important factor affecting the joint function and the implant life. Taking the ratio of the medial-lateral position of the femoral component relative to the tibial insert (a/A) as a parameter, and considering nine installation conditions of the femoral component, this study established the musculoskeletal multibody dynamics models of UKA to simulate the patients' walking gait, and investigated the influences of the medial-lateral installation positions of the femoral component in UKA on the contact force, joint motion and ligament force of the knee joint. The results showed that, with the increase of a/A ratio, the medial contact force of the UKA implant was decreased and the lateral contact force of the cartilage was increased; the varus rotation, external rotation and posterior translation of the knee joint were increased; and the anterior cruciate ligament force, posterior cruciate ligament force and medial collateral ligament force were decreased. The medial-lateral installation positions of the femoral component in UKA had little effect on knee flexion-extension movement and lateral collateral ligament force. When the a/A ratio was less than or equalled to 0.375, the femoral component collided with the tibia. In order to prevent the overload on the medial implant and lateral cartilage, the excessive ligament force, and the collision between the femoral component and the tibia, it is suggested that the a/A ratio should be controlled within the range of 0.427-0.688 when the femoral component is installed in UKA. This study provides a reference for the accurate installation of the femoral component in UKA.
