Multiresolution discrete optimization registration method of ultrasound and magnetic resonance images based on key points.
10.7507/1001-5515.202211022
- Author:
Zhenlin TAN
1
;
Shengwen GUO
2
Author Information
1. School of Material Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, P. R. China.
2. School of Automation Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, P. R. China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Discrete optimization;
Key points;
Magnetic resonance image;
Multi-resolution decomposition;
Registration;
Ultrasound image
- MeSH:
Humans;
Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods*;
Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods*;
Ultrasonography/methods*;
Algorithms;
Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods*
- From:
Journal of Biomedical Engineering
2023;40(2):202-207
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
The registration of preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) images and intraoperative ultrasound (US) images is very important in the planning of brain tumor surgery and during surgery. Considering that the two-modality images have different intensity range and resolution, and the US images are degraded by lots of speckle noises, a self-similarity context (SSC) descriptor based on local neighborhood information was adopted to define the similarity measure. The ultrasound images were considered as the reference, the corners were extracted as the key points using three-dimensional differential operators, and the dense displacement sampling discrete optimization algorithm was adopted for registration. The whole registration process was divided into two stages including the affine registration and the elastic registration. In the affine registration stage, the image was decomposed using multi-resolution scheme, and in the elastic registration stage, the displacement vectors of key points were regularized using the minimum convolution and mean field reasoning strategies. The registration experiment was performed on the preoperative MR images and intraoperative US images of 22 patients. The overall error after affine registration was (1.57 ± 0.30) mm, and the average computation time of each pair of images was only 1.36 s; while the overall error after elastic registration was further reduced to (1.40 ± 0.28) mm, and the average registration time was 1.53 s. The experimental results show that the proposed method has prominent registration accuracy and high computational efficiency.
