Efficacy and safety of ceftazidime and avibactam sodium in the treatment of carbapenem-resistant organism infection
- VernacularTitle:头孢他啶阿维巴坦钠治疗碳青霉烯类耐药革兰氏阴性菌感染的疗效与安全性
- Author:
Jiaojiao MAO
1
;
Guowen CAO
1
;
Zhu ZHU
1
;
Hong TAO
1
;
Feng XU
1
Author Information
1. Dept. of Pharmacy，the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University，Jiangsu Suzhou 215004，China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
ceftazidime and avibactam sodium;
carbapenem-resistant organism;
infection;
efficacy;
safety
- From:
China Pharmacy
2023;34(16):1984-1988
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE To observe the efficacy and safety of ceftazidime and avibactam sodium （CAZ/AVI） in the treatment of carbapenem-resistant organism （CRO） infection. METHODS The information of patients with CRO infection admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from September 2019 to March 2022 was collected， and the patients were retrospectively divided into observation group （48 cases） and control group （48 cases） according to the treatment plan. The control group was given Polycolistin B sulfate for injection intravenously at a dose of 500 000 U every 12 hours； no dose adjustment was performed in patients with renal insufficiency or receiving continuous renal replacement therapy （CRRT）. The observation group was given continuous micropump of CAZ/AVI for injection intravenously at a dose of 2.5 g every 8 hours for 2 continous hours； among them， the patients with renal insufficiency received an adjusted dose based on creatinine clearance， and no dose adjustment was performed in patients receiving CRRT. The clinical efficacy and microbiological efficacy as well as body temperature， white blood cell （WBC）， C-reactive protein （CRP） and procalcitonin （PCT） before and after treatment were compared between 2 groups. The prognosis and the occurrence of adverse drug reactions were recorded. The factors influencing the clinical efficacy were screened by Logistic regression analysis. RESULTS The effective rate and microbial clearance rate of the observation group were significantly higher than the control group （P＜0.05）. After treatment， body temperature， PCT and CRP of 2 groups were significantly lower than before treatment， and CRP of the observation group was significantly lower than the control （No.SDFEYJLC2105） group （P＜0.05）. There was no statistically significant differencebetween the two groups in terms of rehabilitation discharge rate， the proportion of patients transferred to general wards，the proportion of dead patients， and the total incidence ofadverse drug reactions （P＞0.05）. CAZ/AVI and prolonging therapy duration were more likely to achieve clinical benefits （odds ratios of 1.146， 7.707，P＜0.05）， while lung infection and CRRT may be independent risk factors for treatment failure （odds ratios of 0.182， 0.236， P＜0.05）. CONCLUSIONS CAZ/AVI has good efficacy and safety in the treatment of CRO infection， the appropriate extension of antibacterial treatment time can achieve a higher clinical response rate， while lung infection or CRRT may lead to treatment failure.
