Comparison of two circuit class therapy programs on walking capacity, gait velocity and stair ambulation among patients with chronic stroke: a parallel pretest-posttest pilot study.
https://doi.org/10.47895/amp.vi0.2434
- Author:
Kristofferson G. Mendoza
1
;
Maria Eliza R. Aguila
1
;
Fil Charles S. Alfonso
1
,
2
;
Marianne Grace T. Alfonso
1
,
3
;
Karen D. Elmi
1
;
Edward James R. Gorgon
1
Author Information
1. Department of Physical Therapy, College of Allied Medical Professions, University of the Philippines Manila
2. Bayhealth Medical Center - Kent Campus, Delaware, USA
3. Fox Rehabilitation, Delaware, USA
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
chronic stroke;
circuit-based exercise;
task-oriented training;
impairment-focused treatment;
walking capacity;
gait velocity;
stair ambulation
- From:
Acta Medica Philippina
2021;55(4):379-386
- CountryPhilippines
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:Circuit class therapy is a cost-efficient model of treatment that can be beneficial in a setting with limited resources. Current literature has conflicting results regarding which is a more effective approach to stroke rehabilitation: focusing on functional training or on improving impairments. This pilot study provides preliminary information comparing the effects of a task-oriented versus an impairment-focused circuit class therapy on walking ability among patients with chronic stroke.
METHOD:Eighteen participants with a single episode of chronic stroke and limited mobility were randomized into task-oriented circuit class (task group) (n=9) and impairment-focused circuit class (impairment group) (n=9). Both groups underwent intervention thrice a week for four weeks. Blind examination was done using the Ten Meter Walk Test for comfortable gait velocity (CGV) and fast gait velocit(FGV), Time Up and Down Stairs (TUDS), and Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT).
RESULTS:All participants completed the treatment sessions without adverse effects. After four weeks of treatment, the task group showed statistically significant within-group change in CGV (0.12±0.08, p=0.003) and FGV (0.25±0.22, p=0.007). The impairment group only showed statistically significant improvement in 6MWT (25.80±31.2, p=0.038). There were no statistically significant changes between the groups in all outcome measures.
CONCLUSIONS:The preliminary data from this pilot study suggest either program can improve walking-related outcomes and may not be different, although this needs to be confirmed using an appropriately-powered trial.
- Full text:2434-Article Text-13636-2-10-20210723.pdf
