RESEARCH ABOUT LAPAROSCOPY ASSISTED VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY
- VernacularTitle: ДУРАНГИЙН ТУСЛАМЖТАЙГААР УМАЙГ БҮХЛЭЭР АВАХ МЭС ЗАСЛЫН ТАЛААР ХИЙСЭН СУДАЛГАА
- Author:
Unurjargal D
1
;
Erdenebaatar M
;
Dashdemberel B
;
Odbaigal T
;
Aina K
;
Enkhbat TS
;
Ganhuyag B
Author Information
1. First Maternity Hospital
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
laparoscopy, vaginal hysterectomy, LAVH
- From:Innovation
2015;9(3):62-63
- CountryMongolia
- Language:Mongolian
-
Abstract:
Hysterectomy is still the most common major operation performed by gynecologists. Having said that the incidence of hysterectomy has increased last 20 years with new minimally invasive technique. Laparoscopy assisted vaginal hysterectomy has advantage like small incision, less operative pain, quicker recovery, less hospital stay comparing to the abdominal open surgery. Objective: To compare the outcome of abdominal hysterectomy and laparoscopic vaginal hysterectomy.The study population comprised all patients who had LAVH and abdominal hysterectomy at First Maternity Hospital, from June 2013 to December 2014.The mean age of both group is same (46.2±5.3). Duration time of LAVH is approximately 2.30±-5.9minutes and of total abdominal hysterectomy is a 1.41±2.7 minute. The general blood loss during LAVH is 74.4±19 ml and during total abdominal hysterectomy is 185.2 ± 67 ml. After LAVH any patient had no complaints. After LAVH the patient stayed at the hospital for 3 days. LAVH took significantly longer operating time than TAH. Blood loss was jess during LAVH. Hospital stay after LAVH was less than TAH. Drug cost is more case LAVH.
