Usefulness of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test in Screening for Problem Drinkers among College Students.
10.4082/kjfm.2011.32.1.29
- Author:
Jeong Gil LEE
1
;
Jong Sung KIM
;
Jin Gyu JUNG
;
Tae Keun CHOI
;
Young Il RYOU
Author Information
1. Department of Family Medicine, Research Institute for Medical Sciences, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea. jskim@cnuh.co.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
University Student;
AUDIT;
CAGE;
CUGE;
Problem Drinking
- MeSH:
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders;
Drinking;
Eye;
Female;
Health Services;
Humans;
Male;
Mass Screening;
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (U.S.);
ROC Curve
- From:Korean Journal of Family Medicine
2011;32(1):29-36
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) is effective in identifying problem drinking. This study purposed to evaluate the usefulness of AUDIT in identifying problem drinking among Korean university students whose drinking characteristic is different from adults. METHODS: The subjects were 235 students who had visited the Health Service Center of Chungnam National University. All subjects had a diagnostic interview for the presence of at-risk drinking and alcohol use disorder. At-risk drinking was defined according to the criteria of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. Alcohol use disorder was diagnosed by the criteria of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV TR). At-risk drinking or alcohol use disorder was classified into problem drinking. At the same time, a survey was conducted using three screening tools: AUDIT, cut down, annoyed, guilty feelings, eye opener (CAGE), and cut down, under influence, guilty feelings, eye opener (CUGE). Area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of the questionnaires to the results of interviews were compared. RESULTS: Seventy one students were at-risk drinkers and 46 had alcohol use disorder, and 75 were classified into problem drinkers. For identification of problem drinking, AUROC of AUDIT was 0.970 in men and 0.989 in women. For CAGE, it was 0.650 in men and 0.747 in women. For CUGE, it was 0.689 in men and 0.745 in women. CONCLUSION: Above results suggest that AUDIT is most effective in identifying university students' problem drinking.
