Effect of phantoms with different cavity thickness on dose verificationupper esophageal cancer
10.13491/j.issn.1004-714X.2021.03.007
- VernacularTitle:不同空腔厚度模体对上段食管癌剂量验证的影响
- Author:
Jun HONG
1
;
Jihua HAN
1
;
Yan ZHANG
1
;
Xiaoye ZHANG
1
;
Zhijian ZHU
1
;
Tingting SHI
1
Author Information
1. The Affiliated Huaian First People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Huai'an 223300 China.
- Publication Type:DiagnosisandTreatment/OriginalArticles
- Keywords:
Cavity Phantom;
Dose Verification;
Upper Esophageal Carcinoma;
Dynamic Intensity Modulation;
Gamma Pass Rate
- From:
Chinese Journal of Radiological Health
2021;30(3):282-287
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the dose calculation accuracy of two algorithms in Monaco TPS for self-made phantoms with different cavity thickness, and analyze the influence of phantoms with different cavity thickness on dose verification of upper esophageal cancer. Methods The phantoms with different cavity thickness were placed on the simulated CT positioning machine to scan and acquire images. In Monaco TPS, the irradiation fields with energy of 6 MV, 100 MU and different square field sizes were added to the acquired images. The dose of the cavity of the ionization chamber was calculated by two algorithms, and measured on the accelerator by dosimeter under the same conditions. At the same time, 20 patients with upper esophageal cancer who received dynamic intensity modulation in fixed field were randomly selected and included in the study, and two algorithms were used for dose verification on phantoms with different cavity thickness. The results were statistically analyzed by SPSS 22.0 software. Results The maximum deviations between the calculated values and the measured values were 0.66% and −1.8%, in the calculation of phantoms with different cavity thickness by algorithms of Monte Carlo and Pencil Beam. In Monte Carlo algorithm, the result of RD pair t test is P > 0.05. Paired t test of AD (0 mm, 10 mm), (5 mm, 10 mm) and (10 mm, 20 mm) groups showed no significant difference (P < 0.05). The maximum deviation was 1.1%, and the rest groups were not statisticely significant (P > 0.05); In Pencil Beam algorithm the t test results of RD (0 mm, 20 mm) and (5 mm, 20 mm) pairs were (P < 0.05), the maximum deviation was 0.58%, and the rest groups were (P > 0.05). In AD group, (P < 0.05), the maximum deviation was 2.78%; The paired t test between the two algorithms was (P < 0.05), and the maximum deviations in RD and AD groups were 2.49% and 4.14%, respectively. Conclusion Monte Carlo algorithm has accurate calculation and high gamma pass rate of dose verification, and there is no clinical difference in gamma pass rate of dose verification among phantoms with different cavity thickness, pencil Beam algorithm is not recommended in cavity phantom calculation.
