Exploration of establishing the evaluation index system of professional and specialized drug inspectors in China
- VernacularTitle:我国药品检查员职业化专业化评价指标体系的构建探索
- Author:
Di HU
1
,
2
;
Yuemin DAI
3
;
Ruoyin DING
3
;
Xin ZHU
3
;
Yuanyuan GE
3
;
Guiliang CHEN
3
;
Yuwen CHEN
1
Author Information
1. School of Business Administration，Shenyang Pharmaceutical University，Shenyang 110016，China
2. Shanghai Municipal Drug Administration，Shanghai 200233，China
3. Shanghai Drug Evaluation and Verification Center，Shanghai 201210，China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
drug inspector;
professional;
specialization;
evaluation index;
Delphi method
- From:
China Pharmacy
2023;34(8):911-916
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE To provide scientific basis for establishing the evaluation index system of professional and specialized drug inspectors in China. METHODS Through the method of literature research， group discussions and behavioral event interview， combined with the practice situation of drug inspection at home and abroad， in accordance with the requirements of Chinese laws and regulations and department rules， the evaluation indexes for drug inspectors were extracted and screened. In addition， the Delphi method was used to conduct correspondence with experts in relevant fields so as to determine the evaluation index system of drug inspectors. RESULTS & CONCLUSIONS Finally， 62 experts completed two rounds of anonymous online questionnaires， including 29 experts in the first round and 33 experts in the second round. The questionnaire recovery rates were 96.67% and 94.29% respectively， and the expert authority coefficients were 0.81 and 0.79， indicating a high level of authority among experts. After expert consultation， evaluation index system for professional and specialized drug inspectors had been constructed， including five first-level indexes （personal characteristics， professional knowledge， professional skills， professional behavior and professional ethics） and their corresponding 27 second-level indexes. The average score of the importance of second-level indexes was 4.224- 4.879， the full score ratio was 81.8%-100%， the coefficient of variation was 0.067-0.177， and Kendall’s W was 0.643 （P＜0.001）. It indicates that this evaluation index system is relatively reliable and is expected to become a management tool for promoting the construction of professional and specialized drug inspector team and ensuring the quality of drug inspection.
