Validity of Referral of High Risk Pregnancy in MCH Center.
- Author:
Gui Yeon KIM
1
;
Jung Han PARK
Author Information
1. Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Kyungpook National University College of Medicine, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- MeSH:
Discrimination (Psychology);
Female;
Gestational Age;
Humans;
Infant, Low Birth Weight;
Infant, Newborn;
Midwifery;
Pregnancy;
Pregnancy, High-Risk*;
Pregnant Women;
Referral and Consultation*;
Risk Factors;
Rupture;
Stillbirth
- From:Korean Journal of Preventive Medicine
1989;22(1):146-152
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
To test the validity of referral of high risk pregnancy in the MCH Center, 6,017 pregnant women who visited MCH Center of South District Health Center for delivery between 1 April 1985 and 31 March 1987 were interviewed on arrival to obtain the data for demographic characteristics and obstetric history and traced to check the delivery outcome. Out of 5,820 women whose delivery outcomes were confirmed, 704 women(12.1%) were referred to other hospital or clinic for high risk factors. The proportion of poor delivery outcome(stillbirth, low birth weight and neonatal death) among referred cases was 4.4% while that of the women delivered at the MCH Center was 2.2%(p<0.01). Decision of the midwives for the referral of high risk pregnancy based on their clinical assessment was consistent with the delivery outcome (good or poor) in 86.5%. Major reasons for referral were premature rupture of membrane(46.5%) and cephalopelvic disproportion(20.0%) and the C-section rates for these cases were 10.1%, 17.6%, respectively. Discriminant analysis of the demographic characteristics and obstetric history for the discrimination of delivery outcome showed that gestational age had the highest discriminant function coefficient(0.88) and it was followed by parity(0.37) and maternal education(0.30). Referral of high risk pregnancy by the midwives based on their clinical assessment was considered to be reasonably valid. However, a risk scoring system for an MCH Center which can improve the validity may be developed if one applies the discriminant analysis for more comprehensive independent variable(including clinical assessment of midwife, demographic characteristics and obstetric history) and dependent variable (including medically indicated C-section, complication of pregnancy and delivery, stillbirth, low birth weight, neonatal death and maternal death).
