A Review of Codes of Ethics in the United States and Ethical Dilemmas Surrounding the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA).
10.11637/kjpa.2014.27.2.47
- Author:
Jieun KIM
1
;
Dawnie W STEADMAN
Author Information
1. Department of Anthropology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA. jkim94@utk.edu
- Publication Type:Review
- Keywords:
Ethics;
NAGPRA;
Bioarchaeology
- MeSH:
Anthropology;
Codes of Ethics*;
Ethics;
Humans;
Indians, North American*;
Jurisprudence;
Korea;
Social Control, Formal;
Societies;
United States*
- From:Korean Journal of Physical Anthropology
2014;27(2):47-63
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
A growing number of studies related to human remains in Korea highlight the need for developing professional ethics codes and laws that govern disposition and treatment of human remains. In order to provide models for developing ethics codes and regulations relevant to the field of biological anthropology in Korea, the current paper presents a review of ethics codes in the United States related to the procurement, curation, and study of human remains. In the first half of the paper, we provide a full treatment of ethics codes of major professional organizations, including code definition, development, and revision. The latter half of the paper is dedicated to discussions of ethical issues surrounding a United States federal law, the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), and a high-profile case of the Kennewick man, the Ancient One. These two examples will demonstrate the difficulty in anticipating ethical issues and unintended misconduct in the course of research. NAGPRA and the Kennewick Man further emphasize three simple yet important take-home points for biological anthropologists and other professionals working with human remains: 1) to be reflective about potential ethical issues related to their research, 2) to be collaborative and encourage involvement of descendant communities at all stages of research, and 3) to be respectful of different worldviews of death between (sub)cultures. Finally, we close our discussion with possible sources of ethical conflicts in Korea to help prepare biological anthropologists as more excavations of human remains take place in Korea.
