Effects of bilateral erector spinae plane block for posterior lumbar spine surgery in elderly patients.
10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2023.220151
- Author:
Jie PENG
1
;
Wenqi ZHANG
2
;
Youping WU
2
;
Yongyuan MA
2
;
Wenbin QIE
2
;
Bo XU
2
Author Information
1. Department of Anesthesiology, General Hospital of Southern Theater Command, People's Liberation Army of China, Guangzhou 510010, China. excelsiorschola@163.com.
2. Department of Anesthesiology, General Hospital of Southern Theater Command, People's Liberation Army of China, Guangzhou 510010, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
analgesia;
elderly patient;
erector spinae plane block;
posterior lumbar spine surgery
- MeSH:
Aged;
Humans;
Middle Aged;
Sufentanil;
Dizziness;
Pain;
Anesthesia, General;
Constipation;
Hypotension;
Nerve Block;
Pain, Postoperative;
Analgesics, Opioid;
Ultrasonography, Interventional
- From:
Journal of Central South University(Medical Sciences)
2023;48(2):206-212
- CountryChina
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVES:With the rapid development of aging population, the number of elderly patients undergoing posterior lumbar spine surgery continues to increase. Lumbar spine surgery could cause moderate to severe postoperative pain, and the conventional opioid-based analgesia techniques have many side effects, which are barriers to the recovery after surgery of the elderly. Previous studies have demonstrated that erector spinae plane block (ESPB) could bring about favorable analgesia in spinal surgery. As far as the elderly are concerned, the analgesic and recovery effects of ESPB on posterior lumbar spine surgery are not completely clear. This study aims to observe the effects of bilateral ESPB on elderly patients undergoing posterior lumbar spine surgery, and to improve the anesthesia techniques.
METHODS:A total of 70 elderly patients of both sex, who were selected from May 2020 to November 2021, scheduled for elective posterior lumbar spine surgery, and in the age of 60-79 years, with American Society of Anesthesiologists class Ⅱ-Ⅲ, were divided into a ESPB group and a control (C) group using a random number table method, with 35 patients each. Before general anesthesia induction, 20 mL 0.4% ropivacaine was injected to the transverse process of L3 or L4 bilaterally in the ESPB group and only saline in the C group. The score of Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) indicating pain at rest and on movement within 48 h after operation, time of first patient control analgesia (PCA), cumulative consumptions of sufentanil within 48 hours, Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) scores on the morning of day 1 and day 2 after operation, Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores at 24 and 48 h after operation, full diet intake times, perioperative adverse reactions such as intraoperative hypotension, postoperative dizziness, nausea, vomiting, and constipation were compared between the 2 groups.
RESULTS:A total of 70 patients were enrolled and 62 subjects completed the study, including 32 in the ESPB group and 30 in the C group. Compared with the C group, the postoperative NRS scores at rest at 2, 4, 6, and 12 h and on movementat at 2, 4, and 6 h were lower, time of first PCA was later, sufentanil consumptions were significantly decreased during 0-12 h and 12-24 h after operation, LSEQ scores on the morning of day 1 and QoR-15 scores at 24 and 48 h after operation were higher, full diet intakes achieved earlier in the ESPB group (all P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidences of intraoperative hypotension, postoperative dizziness, nausea, vomiting, and constipation between the 2 groups (all P>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS:Providing favorable analgesic effects with reduced opioids consumption, bilateral ESPB for posterior lumbar spine surgery in the elderly patients could also improve postoperative sleep quality, promote gastrointestinal functional restoration, and enhance recovery with few adverse reactions.
