Observational study on perioperative outcomes of pelvic exenteration.
10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20221024-00428
- VernacularTitle:盆腔脏器联合切除手术的围手术期临床结局观察研究
- Author:
Hao YUAN
1
;
Bing YAO
1
;
Jun Tao LI
1
;
Wen Liang ZHU
1
;
Dong Lin REN
2
;
Hui WANG
3
;
Teng Hui MA
3
;
Shu Qin CHEN
4
;
Jian Jian WU
1
;
Yi Ran TAO
1
;
Lei YE
1
;
Zhong Yang WANG
1
;
Hu QU
1
;
Bo MA
1
;
Wen Wen ZHONG
1
;
De Juan WANG
1
;
Jian Guang QIU
1
Author Information
1. Department of Urology, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510655, China.
2. Department of Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510655, China.
3. Department of Colorectal Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510655, China.
4. Department of Gynecology, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510655, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Humans;
Pelvic Exenteration/methods*;
Pelvic Neoplasms/surgery*;
Retrospective Studies;
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery*;
Postoperative Complications
- From:
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
2023;26(3):260-267
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective: To investigate the surgical indications and perioperative clinical outcomes of pelvic exenteration (PE) for locally advanced, recurrent pelvic malignancies and complex pelvic fistulas. Methods: This was a descriptive study.The indications for performing PE were: (1) locally advanced, recurrent pelvic malignancy or complex pelvic fistula diagnosed preoperatively by imaging and pathological examination of a biopsy; (2)preoperative agreement by a multi-disciplinary team that non-surgical and conventional surgical treatment had failed and PE was required; and (3) findings on intraoperative exploration confirming this conclusion.Contraindications to this surgical procedure comprised cardiac and respiratory dysfunction, poor nutritional status,and mental state too poor to tolerate the procedure.Clinical data of 141 patients who met the above criteria, had undergone PE in the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from January 2018 to September 2022, had complete perioperative clinical data, and had given written informed consent to the procedure were collected,and the operation,relevant perioperative variables, postoperative pathological findings (curative resection), and early postoperative complications were analyzed. Results: Of the 141 included patients, 43 (30.5%) had primary malignancies, 61 (43.3%) recurrent malignancies, 28 (19.9%) complex fistulas after radical resection of malignancies,and nine (6.4%)complex fistulas caused by benign disease. There were 79 cases (56.0%) of gastrointestinal tumors, 30 cases (21.3%) of reproductive tumors, 16 cases (11.3%) of urinary tumors, and 7 cases (5.0%) of other tumors such mesenchymal tissue tumors. Among the 104 patients with primary and recurrent malignancies, 15 patients with severe complications of pelvic perineum of advanced tumors were planned to undergo palliative PE surgery for symptom relief after preoperative assessment of multidisciplinary team; the other 89 patients were evaluated for radical PE surgery. All surgeries were successfully completed. Total PE was performed on 73 patients (51.8%),anterior PE on 22 (15.6%),and posterior PE in 46 (32.6%). The median operative time was 576 (453,679) minutes, median intraoperative blood loss 500 (200, 1 200) ml, and median hospital stay 17 (13.0,30.5)days.There were no intraoperative deaths. Of the 89 patients evaluated for radical PE surgery, the radical R0 resection was achieved in 64 (71.9%) of them, R1 resection in 23 (25.8%), and R2 resection in two (2.2%). One or more postoperative complications occurred in 85 cases (60.3%), 32 (22.7%)of which were Clavien-Dindo grade III and above.One patient (0.7%)died during the perioperative period. Conclusion: PE is a valid option for treating locally advanced or recurrent pelvic malignancies and complex pelvic fistulas.
