Surgical treatment for ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fracture.
10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2023.03.002
- Author:
Bang DOU
1
;
Wen-Qian MA
1
;
Tao QIN
1
;
Wei ZHU
1
;
Ya-Hui DAI
1
;
Xiao-Bin XU
1
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopaedics, Songjiang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine
, Shanghai 201600, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Anatomical reduction;
Femoral neck fracture;
Femoral shaft fracture;
Fracture fixation;
Ipsilateral
- MeSH:
Male;
Female;
Humans;
Young Adult;
Adult;
Middle Aged;
Aged;
Femur Neck;
Retrospective Studies;
Femoral Neck Fractures/complications*;
Femoral Fractures/complications*;
Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods*;
Femoral Fractures, Distal;
Treatment Outcome;
Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/methods*
- From:
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
2023;36(3):203-208
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To retrospectively analyze efficacy of single structure internal fixation and double structure internal fixation in the treatment of ipsilateral femoral shaft and neck fracture, and analyze their indications.
METHODS:From June 2015 to December 2020, 21 patients with ipsilateral femoral shaft and femoral neck fracture were treated, including 14 males and 7 females, aged 23 to 69 years old with an average of(38.1±12.9) years old. According to different femoral shaft fracture sites, some patients were fixed with cephalomedullary implant for both femoral neck and the femoral shaft(single structure, InterTan or PFNA Ⅱ), some patients were fixed with cannulated screws for the femoral neck and a retrograde locking nail for the femoral shaft (dual structure), and postoperative function and complications were recorded during follow-up. In 10 cases of single-structure fixation, the femoral necks were all basicervical fractures, and the femoral shaft fractures were located in the proximal isthmus;11 cases were double-structure fixation, 9 cases in 11 were basal type of femoral neck, 2 cases in 11 were neck type, and the femoral shaft fractures were located in the isthmus and the distal isthmus.
RESULTS:All patients were followed up for 12 to 27 months. No femoral head necrosis, deformity, delay or nonunion occurred in the patients with single-structure fixation, and no delayed union or nonunion occurred in femoral shaft fractures;At the final follow-up, Harris score of patients with single-structure fixation was 91.8±4.1, with 8 cases were excellent and 2 cases were good. The fractures of patients with dual-structure fixation achieved good union without femoral head necrosis, except 1 case of femoral shaft fracture had delayed union;At the final follow-up, Harris score of patients with dual-structure fixation was 92.4±5.9, 7 cases were excellent, 3 cases were good, and 1 case was fair.
CONCLUSION:Good reduction and fixation is the key to the treatment of such fractures. Both the single-structure fixation and the dual-structure fixation are good methods, and it should be selected according to the locations of femoral shaft and femoral neck fractures. Single-structure fixation is a good choice for femoral shaft fractures located at the proximal isthmus and basal femoral neck fractures. For isthmus and distal femoral shaft fractures combined with ipsilateral femoral neck fractures, dual-structure fixation is recommended.
