Effect of respiratory filter on pulmonary function in occupational health examination.
10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20211026-00518
- Author:
Yi Ming SHI
1
;
Liu DENG
1
;
Jia Hui LI
1
;
Ai Chu YANG
2
;
Kai Sheng HUANG
3
Author Information
1. Jiangmen Institute of Occupational Disease Prevention and Control, Surveillance and Inspection Department, Jiangmen 529000, China.
2. Guangdong Province Hospital for Occupational Disease Prevention and Treatment, Occupational Health Surveillance Institute, Guangzhou 510300, China.
3. Jieyang Fourth People's Hospital, Medical Department, Jieyang 522031, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Breathing filter;
Lung function;
Occupational health examination;
Vital capacity
- MeSH:
Humans;
Adult;
Occupational Health;
Lung;
Vital Capacity;
Forced Expiratory Volume;
Respiratory Function Tests/methods*
- From:
Chinese Journal of Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Diseases
2023;41(1):35-38
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective: To explore the influence and significance of respiratory filter on the judgment of pulmonary function and the conclusion of occupational health examination in occupational health examination. Methods: From August to November 2020, 252 occupational health examinees were randomly selected as the research objects, and the lung function was examined with the respiratory filter bite and the straight cylinder bite without filter, respectively. The lung function examination indexes and the qualification rate of lung function examination were analyzed and compared between the two groups, and the diagnostic criteria of lung function examination was corrected. Results: 252 subjects were 36 (30, 42) years old. The qualified rate of lung function examination with respiratory filter bite (28.17%, 71/252) was lower than that with straight cylinder bite (34.92%, 88/252) , the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05) . The percentage of forced vital capacity in normal predicted value (FVC%) , percentage of forced expiratory volume in the first second in normal predicted value (FEV(1)%) , and percentage of forced expiratory volume in the first second in forced vital capacity (FEV(1)/FVC%) of subjects using respiratory filter bite were lower than those using the straight cylinder bite (P<0.05) . The corrected diagnostic criteria of pulmonary function were FVC%>78%, FEV(1)%>77%, FEV(1)/FVC%>68%. There was no significant difference between the qualified rate of the respiratory filter bite lung function test calculated according to the corrected diagnostic criteria (35.71%, 90/252) and the qualified rate of the straight cylinder bite lung function test calculated according to the original diagnostic criteria (34.92%, 88/252) (P>0.05) . Conclusion: In occupational health examination, the use of respiratory filter may affect the results of pulmonary function examination. The diagnostic criteria of pulmonary function can be corrected according to different filtering effects to ensure the accuracy of the conclusions of occupational health examination.
