A retrospective comparative study between robotic thyroidectomy through transoral vestibular approach and bilateral breast-axillary approach.
10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20220810-00348
- Author:
Chen Yu LI
1
;
Qing Qing HE
1
;
Xiao Lei LI
1
;
Jing YUAN
2
;
Da Yong ZHUANG
1
;
Peng ZHOU
1
;
Tao YUE
1
;
Yong Xiang LIU
1
;
Chang Xiu SHAO
1
;
Jing XU
1
Author Information
1. Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, the 960th Hospital of People's Liberation Army, Jinan 250031, China.
2. Department of Information, the 960th Hospital of People's Liberation Army, Jinan 250031, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Male;
Female;
Humans;
Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods*;
Thyroid Neoplasms/surgery*;
Thyroidectomy/methods*;
Retrospective Studies;
Neck Dissection/methods*;
Axilla/pathology*;
Treatment Outcome
- From:
Chinese Journal of Surgery
2023;61(3):227-231
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective: To compare the surgical outcome of robotic thyroidectomy through transoral approach and the bilateral breast-axillary approach. Methods: Retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of patients who performed transoral robotic thyroidectomy (TORT group) or bilateral breast-axillary approach (BABA group) in the Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, the 960th Hospital of People's Liberation Army from July 2020 to May 2022. Both groups received lobectomy with lymph node dissection of the central region. A total of 100 cases were included in the study, including 48 cases in the TORT group and 52 cases in the BABA group. The propensity score matching method was used for 1∶1 matching of patients between the 2 groups, with a match tolerance of 0.03. There were 31 patients in each group successfully matched. In the TORT group, there were 5 males and 26 females, aged (33.2±7.9) years (range: 21 to 53 years). While there were 4 males and 27 females in the BABA group, aged (34.6±9.2) years (range: 19 to 58 years). The t test, Mann-Whitney U test, χ2 test or Fisher exact test were used to compare the clinical efficacy between the two groups. Results: All the patients successfully completed robotic thyroid surgery without conversion to open surgery. Compared with BABA group, the TORT group had longer operation time ((211.3±57.2) minutes vs. (126.2±37.8) minutes, t=6.915, P<0.01), shorter drainage tube retention time ((5.4±1.0) days vs. (6.4±1.2) days, t=-3.544, P=0.001), shorter total hospital stay ((6.6±1.2) days vs. (7.4±1.3) days, t=-2.353, P=0.022), and higher cosmetic score (9.46±0.25 vs. 9.27±0.26, t=2.925, P=0.005). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the number of lymph nodes dissection, metastasis in the central compartment, and the incidence of postoperative complications (all P>0.05). Conclusions: Compared with the bilateral breast-axillary approach, the transoral vestibular approach of robotic thyroidectomy is also safe and effective. It shows similar surgical results to the bilateral breast-axillary approach in strictly selected patients, but the postoperative recovery speed is much faster, and the hospital stay is shorter. Transoral robotic thyroidectomy is a more recommended surgical method for patients with high aesthetic demand.
