Comparison of prognosis in two methods for the lingual nerve repair: direct suture with vein graft cuff and collagen allograft method
10.1186/s40902-022-00335-9
- Author:
Shigeyuki FUJITA
1
;
Itaru TOJYO
;
Takashi NAKANISHI
;
Shigeru SUZUKI
Author Information
1. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Kimiidera 811-1, Wakayama, 641-8509, Japan
- Publication Type:Research
- From:Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
2022;44(1):6-
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Background:No studies have compared the outcomes of direct perineurial suture with vein graft cuff repair and indirect collagen allograft repair of the lingual nerve following an injury. Therefore, we evaluated and compared the outcomes of each over a 1-year observation period. We retrospectively assessed 20 patients who had undergone microneurosurgical repair of unilateral lingual nerve injuries at the Wakayama Medical University Hospital between May 2015 and March 2019. We utilized two different methods for lingual nerve repair, i.e., direct perineurial repair with a vein graft cuff and interpositional collagen allograft repair. Sensory and taste function in the lingual nerve were preoperatively evaluated using a static two-point discrimination test, superficial pain/tactile sensation test, tests for the pressure pain threshold (Semmens-Weinstein monofilament), test for thermal discrimination hot and cold sensation, and a taste discrimination test. These tests were performed again at 6 and 12 months postoperatively.
Results:Compared to the preoperative conditions, all patients showed improved sensory reactions. Functional sensory recovery outcomes were defined by Pogrel’s criteria, Medical Research Council Scale grades, and functional sensory recovery. In each group, all patients improved after the operation. However, the operation time was significantly shorter for an interpositional collagen allograft repair as compared to that for a direct perineurial repair with a vein graft cuff.
Conclusions:There were no statistically significant differences between the two repair Methods, except for the operation time. Both methods led to satisfactory results for all criteria. From an economic point of view, direct perineurial repair with a vein graft cuff is meaningful; however, the esthetic effect on the donor site should be considered. Conversely, interpositional collagen allograft repair has the advantage of a greatly shortened operation time.
