Bilateral cleft lip repair by new trending method: a case report
10.1186/s40902-022-00367-1
- Author:
Ji-Yeon KANG
1
Author Information
1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Medicine and Medical Research Institute, Chungnam National University, 282 Munhwa-Ro, Jung-Gu Daejeon, Daejeon, 35015, Korea
- Publication Type:Case report
- From:Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
2022;44(1):38-
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Background:Bilateral cleft lip repair is one of the most difficult surgeries, and many techniques have been modified and developed to improve surgical outcomes. The current trend is toward preserving tissue as much as possible. When the reconstruction is based on the shape of the patient’s own tissue, the most natural appearance is produced, and the relaxed remaining tissue can be benefitted from reducing tension and minimizing scarring.Case presentation.In the conventional surgical method, the rest of the prolabium is sacrificed, except for the tissue used to make the philtrum. We used all tissues for surgery and did not discard any. The tubercle of the median vermilion was used in its original form.
Conclusions:It is fundamental to restore function in cleft lip surgery. Both patients and surgeons have a desire for esthetic outcomes that go beyond function. In addition, the measure of the success of the surgery is the postoperative resemblance to normal midfacial features. Unlike the conventional method of making tubercles by collecting lateral vermilion flaps, we preserved the tissue of the prolabium. Rather than using an artificial tubercle, we were able to create a more natural shape of the upper lip using the patient’s own anatomical structure. In addition, the remaining tissues of the discarded prolabium were used to make the oral mucosa, which may help to reduce tension compared to the conventional method. The modified repair method is expected to gradually become the mainstream method owing to its superior esthetic outcome and less surgical difficulty compared with traditional methods.
