Efficacy of retreatment NiTi files for root canals filled with calcium silicate-based sealer
10.14368/jdras.2022.38.4.213
- Author:
Jae-Yun HYUN
1
;
Kyung-Mo CHO
;
Se-Hee PARK
;
Yoon LEE
;
Yoon-Joo LEE
;
Jin-Woo KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung, Republic of Korea
- Publication Type:Original Article
- From:Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science
2022;38(4):213-221
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Purpose:The efficacy of the amount of sealer in the root canal and two retreatment NiTi file systems in removing filling materials.
Materials and Methods:Extracted premolars with a single root canal were selected for this study. After access opening and root canal preparation up to size #40/.06, the specimens were randomly divided into four groups. Gutta percha (GP) tapers of .06 or .04 were used for each group and filled using a single-cone filling technique with CeraSeal, a calcium silicate-based sealer. Each group was retreated either using the ProTaper Universal Retreatment System (PTUR) or the Hyflex Remover (HR). The time taken to remove the filling material, the amounts of apically extruded debris, and canal cleanliness were measured and compared.
Results:The amount of sealer did not affect the efficiency when removing the filling materials. However, the filling material was removed faster in the HR group than in the PTUR group. Two types of NiTi files showed similar retreatment effects in the amounts of apically extruded debris and in the degree of canal cleanliness.
Conclusion:The amount of sealer in canal filling had no significant effect on retreatability. Retreatment with HR removed filling materials is faster than PTUR. There was no difference in other removal efficiencies according to the type of retreatment NiTi file.
