Comparative Analysis of Risk Assessment Tools for Infectious Diseases
10.4332/KJHPA.2022.32.4.380
- Author:
Eunmi CHOI
1
;
Darae WOO
;
YoungJune CHOE
;
Jungyong YEH
;
Sangshin PARK
Author Information
1. Graduate School of Urban Public Health, University of Seoul, Korea
- Publication Type:ORIGINAL ARTICLE
- From:Health Policy and Management
2022;32(4):380-388
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Background:Emerging infectious diseases, such as Middle East respiratory syndrome or coronavirus disease 2019, pose a continuous threat to public health, making a risk assessment necessary for infectious disease control and prevention. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the risk assessment methods for infectious diseases used by major foreign countries and organizations.
Methods:We conducted an investigation and comparative analysis of risk assessment and risk determination methods for infectious diseases. The risk assessment tools included the strategic toolkit for assessing risks, influenza risk assessment tool, pandemic severity assessment framework, and rapid risk assessment methodology.
Results:The most frequently reported risk elements were disease severity, antiviral treatment, attack rate, population immunity, and basic productive ratio. The risk evaluation method was evaluated quantitatively and qualitatively by the stakeholders at each institution. Additionally, the final risk level was visualized in a matrix, framework, and x and y-axis.
Conclusion:Considering the risk assessment tools, the risk element was classified based on the duplicate of each indicator, and risk evaluation and level of risk assessment were analyzed.
