Systematic review of vonoprazan as Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy
- VernacularTitle:伏诺拉生用于幽门螺杆菌根除治疗的系统评价
- Author:
Mengran ZHANG
1
;
Mingge PANG
2
;
Huihong ZHAI
1
Author Information
1. Dept. of Gastroenterology，Xuanwu Hospital，Capital Medical University，Beijing 100053，China
2. Dept. of Internal Medicine，Beijing Puren Hospital，Beijing 100062，China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Helicobacter pylori;
vonoprazan;
proton pump inhibitors;
eradication therapy;
meta-analysis
- From:
China Pharmacy
2023;34(5):613-619
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan （VPZ） for Helicobacter pylori （Hp） eradication therapy. METHODS Retrieved from The Cochrane Library， Embase， PubMed， CNKI， VIP and Wanfang database， randomized controlled trials about VPZ for Hp eradication therapy （trial group） versus proton pump inhibitor （PPI） （control group） were collected during the inception to July 2022. After data extraction and quality evaluation with bias risk assessment tool recommended by Cochrane System Evaluation Manual 5.1.0， meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan5.3 software. RESULTS Nine studies with 2 134 patients were included. Compared with control group， the overall Hp eradication rate of trial group increased significantly in either the ITT analysis or PP analysis， being 87.5% vs. 76.2% [RR＝1.14， 95%CI （1.06，1.21）， P＜0.001] and 92.4% vs. 80.5% [RR＝1.11， 95%CI （1.03，1.21）， P＜0.01]， respectively. According to ITT and PP analysis of primary treatment subgroup， compared with control group， the overall Hp eradication rate of trial group increased significantly， being 88.4% vs. 76.5% [RR＝1.15， 95%CI （1.09，1.22）， P＜0.000 01] and 92.8% vs. 80.9% [RR＝1.12， 95%CI（1.03，1.23）， P＜ 0.05]； according to ITT and PP analysis of rescue therapy subgroup， there was no significant difference in the overall Hp eradication rate between control group and trial group （P＞0.05）. According to ITT and PP analysis of triple therapy subgroup， compared with control group， overall Hp eradication rate of trial group increased significantly， being 88.3% vs. 75.6% [RR＝1.16， 95%CI （1.08， 1.25）， P＜0.000 1] and 92.6% vs. 77.6% [RR=1.15， 95%CI （1.04， 1.28）， P＜0.01]； according to ITT and PP analysis of quadruple therapy subgroup， there was no significant difference in the overall Hp eradication rate between control group and trial group （P＞0.05）. Compared with control group， the incidence of adverse events in trial group decreased significantly， being 34.2% vs. 40.9% [RR＝0.84， 95%CI（0.70，0.99）， P＜ 0.05]. There was no statistical significance in the incidence of serious adverse events between 2 groups （P＞0.05）. CONCLUSIONS Compared with PPI therapy， the efficacy of VPZ-based triple therapy is better， particularly in primary treatment patients. However， VPZ has no significant advantage in rescue treatment and bismuth-containing quadruple regimen. And the safety and tolerance of VPZ for Hp eradication therapy are well， even better than PPI.
