The Women’s Health Initiative after 17 years: Has it done more harm than good?
- Author:
Delfin A. Tan
1
;
Gladys Anne M. Bermio
1
Author Information
- Publication Type:Case Reports
- MeSH: Female; Estrogens, Conjugated (USP); Medroxyprogesterone Acetate
- From: Philippine Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2019;43(4):34-38
- CountryPhilippines
- Language:English
- Abstract: This commentary is focused primarily on the relationship between menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) and breast cancer risk, the primary adverse outcome measure of the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) hormone trials. The WHI hormone trials are to date the largest randomized, placebo-controlled studies that evaluated the risks and benefits of hormone therapy in postmenopausal women. There are two arms: the estrogen-progestin (conjugated equine estrogen/medroxyprogesterone acetate) arm for women with intact uterus and the estrogen-alone (conjugated equine estrogen) arm for women who had a hysterectomy1. Both arms, planned to continue for 8.5 years, were stopped prematurely, the CEE/MPA arm after a mean of 5.2 years of follow-up and the CEE-alone arm after a mean of 7.2 years follow-up.
- Full text:the-womens-health-initiative-after-17-years.pdf
