The Effectiveness of Progressive Tension Suture at Latissimus Dorsi Muscle Harvest.
- Author:
Joo Bong MOON
1
;
Jung Min PARK
;
Yong Seok KWON
;
Keun Cheol LEE
;
Seok Kwun KIM
;
Se Heon CHO
Author Information
1. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery-Breast Center, College of Medicine, Dong-A University, Busan, Korea. sgkim1@daunet.donga.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Progressive tension suture;
Seroma;
Latissimus dorsi muscle
- MeSH:
Cicatrix;
Drainage;
Female;
Hematoma;
Humans;
Incidence;
Length of Stay;
Mammaplasty;
Necrosis;
Retrospective Studies;
Seroma;
Skin;
Superficial Back Muscles*;
Sutures*;
Tissue Donors;
Wounds and Injuries
- From:Journal of the Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons
2007;34(5):611-616
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The latissimus dorsi muscle flap is a versatile flap used in a variety of reconstructive procedures. The most common complication of LD muscle flap is donor site seroma, reported to occur in 20 to 79 percent of cases. The formation of dead space under the flap is intimately associated with seroma formation. The authors think that the use of progressive tension suture at closing donor site can decrease the formation of dead space and ultimately reduce the incidence of donor site seroma. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed with 38 patients who underwent latissimus dorsi muscle harvest for breast reconstruction from March 2003 to September 2004. Progressive tension sutures were used during donor site closure in 22 patients. This group was compared with controls group(16 patients) who underwent latissimus dorsi muscle harvest without using this technique. Operation time, length of hospital stay, period of drainage, complication, and satisfaction about postoperative scar of donor site were examined. RESULTS: The average length of hospital stay was 10.2 days and 12.7 days, and the mean duration of drainage were 7.3 days and 11.7 days in each progressive suture group and control group. These results were statistically significant (p<0.05). In the 22 patients who underwent progressive tension suture, none had seroma, hematoma or skin necrosis. In control group(16 patients), there happened one seroma formation and one partial skin necrosis. These complications were healed by aspiration of seroma and wound revision. The patients' satisfaction was not statistically significant, but the higher points were given by the patients who underwent progressive tension suture. CONCLUSION: This technique, progressive tension suture, is an effective method to reduce or eliminate donor site seroma, which is the most common complication associated with latissimus dorsi muscle harvest.
