Visual Disturbance following Autologous Fat Injection into Periorbital Area.
- Author:
Young Woo JEON
1
;
Sung Soo KIM
;
Sang Wook HA
;
Young Dae LEE
;
Chul Hwan SEUL
;
Kwan Chul TARK
;
Eul Jae CHO
;
Won Min YOO
Author Information
1. Institute of Human Tissue Restoration, Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. wnmnyoo@yumc.yonsei.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Autologous fat injection;
Visual disturbance
- MeSH:
Anti-Bacterial Agents;
Blindness;
Depression;
Embolism, Fat;
Emergency Service, Hospital;
Eyebrows;
Female;
Foreign-Body Reaction;
Hand;
Humans;
Magnetic Resonance Imaging;
Massage;
Optic Nerve;
Optic Neuritis;
Retinal Artery;
Surgery, Plastic;
Visual Fields;
Young Adult
- From:Journal of the Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons
2007;34(5):663-666
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: Autologous fat injection into the facial area is a frequently used technique in aesthetic plastic surgery for augmentation of the soft tissue. Fat injection is a very safe procedure because of the advantage of being autologous tissue. Minimal foreign body reaction or infections are noted after fat injection. However, there may be some complications including those as severe as blindness. There have been some case reports on visual disturbances after autologous fat injection reported in the literature. METHODS: A 21-year-old female patient underwent autologous fat injection into left eyebrow area to correct depression of soft tissue. Immediately after injection of autologous fat, she complained sudden visual loss on the left eye. She had come to our emergency room and ophthalmologic evaluation showed that the patient could only recognize hand motion. There was no abnormality of the optic nerve on magnetic resonance imaging. Suspecting an ischemic optic neuritis from fat embolism of the central retinal artery, the patient was treated conservatively with occular massage, antiglaucomatic agent, anti-inflammatory drugs and antibiotics. Visual field examination showed visual defect of half the lower hemisphere. RESULTS: While maintaining antiglaucomatic agents and non steroidal anti inflammatory drugs, fundoscopic examination showed no abnormalities on the second day of admission. Visual field examination showed an improvement on the fourth day along with decreased eyeball pain. Significant improvement of vision was noted and the patient was discharged on the fifth day of admission. The patient was followed-up 2 days afterwards with improved vision and visual field defect. CONCLUSION: We describe an unusual case of sudden unilateral visual disturbance following autologous fat injection into periorbital area.
