Comparison of the clinical profile of patients with glaucoma between private and government clinics in the Philippines.
- Author:
Edgar Felipe U LEUENBERGER
1
;
James Paul S GOMEZ
1
;
Robert Edward T ANG
1
;
Maria Imelda YAP-VELOSO
1
;
Joseph Anthony J TUMBOCON
2
;
Jose Maria D MARTINEZ
3
;
John Mark S DE LEON
2
;
Nilo Vincent FLORCRUZ
4
;
Rainier Victor A COVAR
4
;
Irene R FELARCA
1
;
Denise Polly CHAO-PO
2
;
Shalam SIAO-MARIANO
3
;
Marie Joan Therese D BALGOS
4
;
Noel D ATIENZA
2
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Human; Glaucoma; Patients
- From: Philippine Journal of Ophthalmology 2019;44(2):45-53
- CountryPhilippines
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: To describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with glaucoma managed at private and government institutions in the Philippines between 2009 and 2014.
METHODS: A research team from two private and two government institutions in the Philippines reviewed the case records of 1246 patients seen who met the following criteria: intraocular pressure of >21 mmHg, optic nerve and nerve fiber layer abnormalities, and visual field defects. For bilateral cases, we selected the eye with worse glaucoma parameters.
RESULTS: There were 600 and 646 patients in the private and government groups (mean age at presentation, 60.51 and 55.88 years), respectively, with the majority being Filipino (91%). Patients with visual acuity (VA) of 20/20 to 20/40 were more frequently observed in private centers (58.7% vs. 41.3%), while a VA worse than counting fingers was more frequently observed in government centers (66.1% vs. 33.9%). Within-group analysis showed that primary angle-closure glaucoma was the most frequent glaucoma subtype in both private (27.3%) and government institutions (37.8%). In between-group analysis showed the following to be more common in private than government centers: primary open-angle glaucoma (61.3% vs. 38.7%), normal-tension glaucoma (63.9% vs. 36.1%), ocular hypertension (92.3% vs. 7.7%), and glaucoma suspects (80.4% vs. 19.6%) while government institutions registered a larger number of primary angle-closure glaucoma (59.8% vs. 40.2%) and secondary glaucoma (70.3% vs. 29.7%) cases. Medical treatment using a single drug and multiple drugs was employed for 245 (23%) and 825 (77%) patients, respectively. Within-group analysis showed that laser iridotomy and trabeculectomy were the most commonly performed laser and surgical procedures in both institution types.
CONCLUSION: There is a contrasting profile of glaucoma between clinical institutions in the Philippines with openangle glaucoma being more predominant in private centers while closed-angle glaucoma and secondary glaucoma being more frequent in government centers. Our findings may provide important preliminary information that can aid future health studies or training programs.
- Full text:PJO 023.pdf