Prevalence of and associations for complementary and alternative medicine use among apparently healthy individuals in the Philippine LIFECARE cohort.

Mary Ann J Ladia; Olivia T Sison; Nina T Castillo-carandang; Rody G SY; Elmer Jasper B Llanes; Paul Ferdinand M Reganit; Felix Eduardo R Punzalan; Wilbert Allan G Gumatay; Felicidad V Velandria

Return

Prevalence of and associations for complementary and alternative medicine use among apparently healthy individuals in the Philippine LIFECARE cohort.

Author: Mary Ann J. LADIA ^{1
,

2} ; Olivia T. SISON ^{1
,

2
,

3} ; Nina T. CASTILLO-CARANDANG ^{1
,

2
,

3} ; Rody G. SY ^{3
,

4
,

5
,

6} ; Elmer Jasper B. LLANES ^{3
,

4
,

5} ; Paul Ferdinand M. REGANIT ^{3
,

4
,

5} ; Felix Eduardo R. PUNZALAN ^{3
,

4
,

5} ; Wilbert Allan G. GUMATAY ³ ; Felicidad V. VELANDRIA ³
Author Information

1. Institute of Clinical Epidemiology, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines Manila
2. Department of Clinical Epidemiology, College of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila
3. Philippine Life Course Study in Cardiovascular Disease Epidemiology (LIFECARE)
4. Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila
5. Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines Manila
6. Cardinal Santos Medical Center, San Juan City, Metro Manila
Publication Type:Journal Article
MeSH: Human; Male; Female; Middle Aged (a Person 45-64 Years Of Age); Adult (a Person 19-44 Years Of Age); Complementary Therapies; Complementary Therapies; Medicine, Traditional; Herbal Medicine; Philippines
From: Acta Medica Philippina 2018;52(5):404-410
CountryPhilippines
Language:English
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: The study determined the prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use and its association with socio-demographic and clinical characteristics among adult Filipinos aged 20-50 years.
METHODS: Data from the Philippine cohort of the Life Course Study in Cardiovascular Disease Epidemiology (LIFECARE) in Luzon were analyzed. Multiple logistic regression determined the factors associated with the use of CAM.
RESULTS: A total of 3,072 participants were included: average age of 36 years, more females, mostly married, living in the rural areas, and employed. The prevalence of CAM use in this population was 43%. The commonly sought traditional medicine practitioners were manghihilot (bone setter or partera) and albularyo (herbalist), and participants used herbal medicines and supplements. Use of CAM was more likely among older participants, females, living in rural areas, had medical consultation in the last six months, experienced moderate to extreme pain, and with poor perception of general health.
CONCLUSION: The use of CAM is prevalent among apparently healthy individuals aged 20-50 years. Further studies should uncover reasons for CAM use.
Full text:304-Article Text-1174-1-10-20191111.pdf