Expressions of TRIM25 and RIG-Ⅰ in liver cancer tissues and their relationship with prognosis of patients
10.3760/cma.j.cn115355-20220407-00208
- VernacularTitle:TRIM25、RIG-Ⅰ在肝癌组织中的表达及其与患者预后的关系
- Author:
Xiaotian ZHANG
1
;
Haixiao WANG
;
Jian WU
Author Information
1. 南京医科大学附属淮安第一医院病理科，淮安 223300
- Keywords:
Liver neoplasms;
TRIM25;
RIG-Ⅰ;
Prognosis
- From:
Cancer Research and Clinic
2022;34(11):812-816
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the expressions of TRIM25 and RIG-Ⅰ in liver cancer tissues and their relationship with the prognosis of patients.Methods:The data of 82 patients with liver cancer who were admitted to the Affiliated Huai'an No. 1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from January 2017 to January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed, and their cancer tissue and paracancerous tissue (>5 cm from the edge of the tumor) specimens were collected. The protein expressions of TRIM25 and RIG-Ⅰ in cancer tissues and paracancerous tissues were detected by immunohistochemistry. The relationship between TRIM25 and RIG-Ⅰ expressions in cancer tissues of patients and clinicopathological features was analyzed. Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze the overall survival (OS) of patients with different TRIM25 and RIG-Ⅰ expression status.Results:The positive rate of TRIM25 in cancer tissues was higher than that in paracancerous tissues [68.29% (56/82) vs. 21.95% (18/82), P < 0.001], and the positive rate of RIG-Ⅰ in cancer tissues was lower than that in paracancerous tissues [31.71% (26/82) vs. 74.39% (61/82), P < 0.001]. The positive rate of TRIM25 in cancer tissues of poorly differentiated patients was higher than that of highly and moderately differentiated patients ( P < 0.05), and the positive rate of RIG-Ⅰ was lower than that of highly and moderately differentiated patients ( P < 0.05). The positive rate of TRIM25 in cancer tissues of patients with extrahepatic metastasis was higher than that of patients without extrahepatic metastasis ( P < 0.05), but the positive rate of RIG-Ⅰ was lower than that of patients without extrahepatic metastasis ( P < 0.05). The positive rate of TRIM25 in patients with clinical Ⅲ-Ⅳ was higher than that in patients with stage Ⅰ-Ⅱ ( P < 0.05), but the positive rate of RIG-Ⅰ was lower than that in patients with stage Ⅰ-Ⅱ ( P < 0.05). The median follow-up time was 27 months (4-48 months), 2 patients were lost to follow-up. At the end of follow-up in January 2022, the overall survival rate was 43.75% (35/80). The survival rates of patients with TRIM25-positive and TRIM25-negative cancer tissues were 33.33% (18/54) and 65.38% (17/26), respectively. The survival rates of patients with RIG-Ⅰ-positive and RIG-Ⅰ-negative cancer tissues were 64.00% (16/25) and 34.55% (19/55), respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the OS of patients with TRIM25-negative cancer tissues was better than that of patients with TRIM25-positive cancer tissues, and the OS of patients with RIG-Ⅰ-positive cancer tissues was better than that of patients with TRIM25-negative cancer tissues, and the differences were statistically significant (both P < 0.05). Conclusions:The expression of TRIM25 is increased and the expression of RIG-Ⅰ is decreased in liver cancer tissues. The expressions of TRIM25 and RIG-Ⅰ in liver cancer tissues are associated with prognosis.
