Early clinical results of totally thoracoscopic repeat mitral valve surgery under hypothermic ventricular fibrillation
10.3760/cma.j.cn112434-20220219-00049
- VernacularTitle:低温室颤下全胸腔镜再次二尖瓣手术的早期临床结果
- Author:
Xiaoyi HE
1
;
Lin ZHANG
;
Dong LI
;
Lianggang LI
;
Tong REN
;
Xin ZHANG
;
Yu WEN
;
Shengli JIANG
Author Information
1. 解放军总医院第一医学中心心脏大血管外科，北京 100853
- Keywords:
Totally thoracoscopic;
Hypothermic ventricular fibrillation;
Repeat mitral valve surgery;
Median sternotomy
- From:
Chinese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
2022;38(7):417-422
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes of a totally thoracoscopic repeat mitral valve surgery under hypothermic ventricular fibrillation with those of a conventional median sternotomy approach for repeat mitral valve surgery and to explore the safety of the totally thoracoscopic repeat mitral valve surgery under hypothermic ventricular fibrillation.Methods:Patients requiring repeat mitral valve surgery admitted by the same surgeon at Cardiovascular Surgery, First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital from January 2018 to January 2022 were retrospectively enrolled. The patients were divided into the totally thoracoscopic group under hypothermic ventricular fibrillation and the conventional median sternotomy group according to the procedure, and the preoperative baseline data and perioperative outcomes were collected and statistically analyzed using SPSS 22.0.Results:A total of 91 patients matched the criteria for study enrollment, 25 in the totally thoracoscopic group and 66 in the median sternotomy group. There was no statistical difference in the preoperative baseline data between the two groups. The totally thoracoscopic group has advantages in mitral valvuloplasty rate(32.0% vs. 7.6%, P=0.008), transfusion rate(72.0% vs. 98.5%, P<0.001), mechanical ventilation time [(19.0±27.8)h vs.(43.3±58.3)h, P=0.009], chest drainage tube time [(2.2±1.9)days vs.(3.7±2.4)days, P=0.004], postoperative chest drainage volume [(489.6±319.1)ml vs.(913.6±568.4)ml, P=0.001], postoperative discharge time[(8.0±2.7)days vs.(13.9±12.8)days, P=0.026]. The totally thoracoscopic group had a longer cardiopulmonary bypass time [(180.8±41.7)min vs.(143.2±39.7)min, P<0.001], and it had an intraoperative ventricular fibrillation time of(100.2±42.5)min. There were no statistically significant differences in the postoperative complication rate(12.0% vs. 21.2%, P=0.481) and mortality(4.0% vs. 4.5%, P=1.000) between the two groups. Conclusion:The totally thoracoscopic approach has the characteristics of less invasion and faster recovery compared with the median sternotomy approach. Hypothermic ventricular fibrillation simplifies the procedure at the ascending aorta while reducing myocardial injury than conventional occlusion of the ascending aorta. Totally thoracoscopic mitral valve surgery under hypothermic ventricular fibrillation is a safe minimally invasive technique.
