Efficacy of compound chamomile and lidocaine hydrochloride gel in prevention of complications related to laryngeal mask airway insertion
10.3760/cma.j.cn131073.20211216.00606
- VernacularTitle:复方甘菊利多卡因凝胶对喉罩置入术相关并发症的预防效果
- Author:
Xiaoling LIU
1
;
Risheng CHEN
;
Zhaohui DONG
;
Xiaoli HU
;
Ping XIE
;
Hongyan WANG
;
Wenqing CHEN
;
Weihua LI
Author Information
1. 深圳市萨米医疗中心（深圳市第四人民医院） 麻醉科，深圳 518000
- Keywords:
Laryngeal masks;
Postoperative complications;
Compound chamomile lidocaine gel
- From:
Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology
2022;42(6):675-679
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate the efficacy of compound chamomile and lidocaine hydrochloride gel in prevention of complications related to laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion.Methods:Ninety American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Ⅰ or Ⅱ patients, aged 18-60 yr, undergoing elective surgery with ventilation using LMA under general anesthesia, were divided into 3 groups ( n=30 each) using a random number table method: paraffin oil group (group A), compound lidocaine cream group (group B), and compound chamomile and lidocaine hydrochloride gel group (group C). The paraffin oil, compound lidocaine cream, and compound chamomile and lidocaine hydrochloride gel were evenly applied on the front, shoulder and back of the LMA before inserting the LMA in A, B and C groups, respectively.The severity of sore throat, oropharyngeal mucositis score, hoarseness score and occurrence in each time period (0-1 h, >1-6 h, >6-24 h, > 24-48 h) were recorded at 1, 6, 24 and 48 h after removal of the laryngeal mask.The stress responses during removal of the LMA and occurrence of drug-related adverse reactions within 48 h after removal of LMA were recorded. Results:Twenty-nine cases in group A, 28 cases in group B and 27 cases in group C completed the trial.Compared with group A, the severity of sore throat at each time point after removal of the LMA and incidence of sore throat in each time period were significantly decreased, the oropharyngeal mucositis score at 6, 24 and 48 h after removal of the LMA and the incidence of oropharyngeal mucositis in the time period >1-48 h were decreased, and the incidence of drug-related adverse reactions was increased in group C ( P<0.05). Compared with group B, the severity of sore throat at 6 h after removal of the LMA and incidence of sore throat > 1-48 h after removal of the LMA were significantly decreased, the oropharyngeal mucositis score at 6, 24 and 48 h after removal of the LMA and incidence of oropharyngeal mucositis in the time period >1-48 h after LMA removal were reduced, and the incidence of drug-related adverse reactions was decreased in group C ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the hoarseness score and incidence of hoarseness after removal of the LMA and incidence of stress responses during removal of the LMA among the three groups ( P>0.05). Conclusions:Compound chamomile and lidocaine hydrochloride gel has a certain efficacy in preventing complications related to LMA placement.
