Influence of prostate cancer seminal vesicle invasion imaging classification on positive surgical margin after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
10.3760/cma.j.cn112330-20220518-00295
- VernacularTitle:前列腺癌精囊受侵影像分型对腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性的影响
- Author:
Fan ZHANG
1
;
Xinlong PEI
;
Ye YAN
;
Min LU
;
Cheng LIU
;
Shudong ZHANG
;
Yi HUANG
;
Lulin MA
Author Information
1. 北京大学第三医院泌尿外科，北京 100191
- Keywords:
Prostatic neoplasms;
Carcinoma;
Seminal vesicle invasion;
Surgical margin;
Prostatectomy
- From:
Chinese Journal of Urology
2022;43(7):523-528
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the effect of different imaging classifications of prostate cancer seminal vesicle invasion on positive surgical margins (PSM) after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy(LRP).Methods:114 patients with pT 3b stage prostate cancer admitted to Peking University Third Hospital from August 2009 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The age of the patients was (68.2±7.7) years old, the median pre-biopsy PSA was 20.20 (3.45-186.30) ng/ml, and the patients with biopsy Gleason score of ≤7, and ≥8 was 33 and 81 cases, respectively. The median prostate volume was 33.2 (12.1-155.4) ml. According to the imaging of the seminal vesicle invasion of prostate cancer, the patients were divided into the following types: type Ⅰ, the tumor directly invades the seminal vesicle along the vas deferens; type Ⅱa, the tumor invades the basal capsule of the prostate and invades the seminal vesicle; type Ⅱb, the tumor invades the periprostatic fat and retrogradely invades the seminal vesicles; type Ⅲ, solitary lesions in the seminal vesicles that do not continue with the prostate cancer. All patients underwent LRP, and the PSM were recorded as the base, bilateral, posterior, anterior and apical parts of the prostate. The differences in clinicopathological data of patients with different seminal vesicle invasion imaging types were compared, and the independent risk factors of PSM in pT 3b prostate cancer were evaluated by multivariate analysis. Results:The operative time of 114 cases in this group was (229.4±62.2) min, and the blood loss was 100(20-1 800)ml. The postoperative gross pathological Gleason score was ≤7 in 17 cases and ≥8 in 97 cases. In the imaging classification of prostate cancer with seminal vesicle invasion, there were 28 cases (24.6%) of type Ⅰ, 39 cases (34.2%) of type Ⅱa, 47 cases (41.2%) of type Ⅱb, and no type Ⅲ patients. There was no significant difference in age, body mass index, pre-biopsy PSA, prostate volume, and operation time among patients with type Ⅰ, Ⅱa, and Ⅱb seminal vesicle invasion ( P>0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in blood loss among the three types ( P = 0.001), and the difference in the proportion of lymph node metastasis was statistically significant ( P = 0.013). In the classification of prostate cancer seminal vesicle invasion, the PSM rates of type Ⅰ, Ⅱa and Ⅱb were 28.6% (8/28), 38.5% (15/39) and 70.2% (33/39), and the difference was statistically significant ( P=0.001). The PSM rates of type Ⅰ, Ⅱa, and Ⅱb were 21.4% (6/28), 23.1% (9/39), and 34.0% (16/47), respectively. The results of univariate analysis showed that the biopsy Gleason score ( P = 0.063) and the type of seminal vesicle invasion ( P<0.001) entered into multivariate analysis, and the results of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the type of seminal vesicle invasion ( P=0.001) was independent risk factor for PSM after LRP. Conclusions:The PSM rate in patients with type Ⅱb seminal vesicle invasion is significantly higher. The higher imaging type of seminal vesicle invasion is the independent risk factor of PSM after LRP.
