Comparison of the long-term efficacy of two-level cervical artificial disc replacement and anterior cervical decompression and fusion
10.3760/cma.j.cn121113-20220212-00062
- VernacularTitle:颈椎双节段人工间盘置换术与前路减压融合术远期疗效的比较
- Author:
Bo ZHANG
1
;
Yan AN
;
Qingpeng SONG
;
Yuzhen JIANG
Author Information
1. 北京积水潭医院脊柱外科，北京 100035
- Keywords:
Cervical vertebrae;
Total disc replacement;
Spinal fusion;
Intervertebral disc degeneration
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
2022;42(14):880-888
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the long-term efficacy of two-level cervical artificial disc replacement (CADR) and anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) in the treatment of cervical degenerative diseases.Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who had received two-level anterior cervical surgery for cervical degenerative diseases for more than 15 years from December 2003 to December 2007. The patients were divided into two groups: CADR and ACDF according to surgical methods. There were 15 patients in the CADR group, including 7 males and 8 females, with an average age of 49.73±10.26 (range, 32-70) years. Three cases of mixed cervical spondylosis, 5 cases of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy, 7 cases of cervical spondylotic myelopathy, including C 3, 4 and C 4, 5 level 1 case, C 3, 4 and C 5, 6 level 2 cases, C 4, 5 and C 5, 6 level 7 cases, C 5, 6 and C 6, 7 level 5 cases, operative segment range of motion (ROM) was 9.10°±4.00°. The follow-up time in the CADR group was 189.07±13.51 (range, 162-210) months. There were 20 patients in the ACDF group, including 12 males and 8 females, with an average age of 52.60±8.83 (range, 32-68) years. Two cases of mixed cervical spondylosis, 3 cases of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy, 15 cases of cervical spondylotic myelopathy, including C 3, 4 and C 4, 5 level 1 case, C 4, 5 and C 5, 6 level 15 cases, C 5, 6 and C 6, 7 level 4 cases, the ROM of the surgical segment was 8.31±5.23°. The mean follow-up time of ACDF group was 184.20±21.39 (range, 156-222) months. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and neck disability index (NDI) were evaluated preoperatively and at the last follow-up. The overall ROM of the cervical spine, ROM of the surgical segment, and Miyazaki grading of the adjacent intervertebral disc, Odom score and complications of the two groups were evaluated at the last follow-up. Results:In the CADR group, the JOA score improved from 13.20±2.64 preoperatively to 15.93±1.22 at last follow-up, and NDI improved from 27.60%±6.44% preoperatively to 15.07%±9.71% at last follow-up, JOA improvement rate was 59.44%±60.86%, and NDI decreased by 12.53%±9.64%. In the ACDF group, JOA score improved from 12.93±2.46 preoperatively to 15.65±1.25 at last follow-up, NDI improved from 30.80%±8.11% preoperatively to 12.80%±6.31% at last follow-up, JOA improvement rate was 60.51%±43.17%, NDI decreased by 18.00%±8.34%. There was no significant difference in JOA and NDI between the two groups before surgery and at the last follow-up. At the last follow-up, the overall ROM of the cervical spine in the CADR group was 38.33°±12.31°, the ROM of the surgical segment was 6.51°±4.61°, and the overall ROM of the cervical spine in the ACDF group was 31.11°±8.65°, the ROM of the surgical segment was 0°. There was a significant difference in the overall ROM of the cervical spine between the two groups at the last follow-up ( t=7.22, P=0.049). The incidence of increased Miyazaki grading of the upper and lower adjacent segment of the cervical intervertebral disc in the CADR group were 40% and 47%, and the rate of new intervertebral disc herniation were 20% and 13%. The incidence of increased Miyazaki grading of the upper and lower adjacent segment of the cervical intervertebral disc in the ACDF group were 45% and 50%, and the incidence of new herniated disc were 25% and 40%, there is a significant difference in the degeneration rate of the lower adjacent segments between the two groups (χ 2=4.38, P=0.036). At the last follow-up, the excellent and good rate of Odom in the CADR group was 80%, and 1 case was revised; the excellent and good rate of Odom in the ACDF group was 85%, and 1 case was revised. There was no significant difference in the overall efficacy between the two groups. Conclusion:The long-term clinical efficacy of two-level CADR is comparable to that of traditional ACDF, and it preserved the ROM of the surgical segment, and is superior to ACDF in terms of the overall cervical spine ROM, and the incidence of adjacent segment degeneration.
