Efficacy of different nutritional therapentic methods on nutritional improvement for pancreatitis patients intolerant to oral feeding
10.3760/cma.j.cn113884-20211117-00372
- VernacularTitle:不同营养支持方式改善胰腺炎不耐受经口进食患者营养水平的疗效分析
- Author:
Qiong WU
1
;
Chao ZHANG
;
Yamin ZHENG
;
Feng CAO
;
Ang LI
;
Ying LI
;
Fei LI
Author Information
1. 首都医科大学宣武医院营养科，北京 100053
- Keywords:
Pancreatitis;
Enteral nutrition;
Parenteral nutrition;
Nasojejunal tube
- From:
Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery
2022;28(6):439-443
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of providing nasogastric (NG), nasojejunal (NJ), and parenteral nutrition (PN) support to pancreatitis patients who were intolerant to oral feeding.Methods:One hundred pancreatitis patients who were intolerant to oral feeding treated at the Xuanwu Hospital of the Capital Medical University from October 2018 to September 2020 were retrospectively studied. They were divided into three groups based on the nutritional support given to them: the NG group, NJ group, and PN group. The acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ), nutritional risk screening 2002 (NRS2002), hemoglobin, albumin, pre-albumin and other clinical data were recorded and compared among the three groups.Results:After nutrition support treatments, the hemoglobin, albumin and pre-albumin levels were significantly better than before giving nutrition support, and the APACHE Ⅱ scores were significantly improved in all the groups. The NRS2002 scores were significantly better in the NJ group ( Z=2.28, P=0.023) and the NG group ( Z=1.99, P=0.046). With compared to the PN group, the albumin and pre-albumin levels were significantly higher in the NG and NJ groups, and the NRS2002 score after giving nutrition support treatment was significantly lower ( P<0.05). Compared with the PN group, the APACHE Ⅱ score ( t=2.18) and the hemoglobin levels ( t=2.04) were significantly better in the NJ group ( P<0.05). The overall incidence of complications in the NJ group was 41.2% (14/34), which was significantly lower than the NG group [78.8%(26/33), χ 2=5.41, P=0.020] and the PN group [66.7% (22/33), χ 2=4.35, P=0.037]. Conclusion:Enteral nutrition support through NG and NJ are better than PN in acute pancreatitis patients who were intolerant to oral feeding.
