Radiation shielding for the intraoperative radiotherapy using low energy X-rays
10.3760/cma.j.cn112271-20220316-00103
- VernacularTitle:低能X射线术中放射治疗的辐射屏蔽
- Author:
Daguang ZHANG
1
;
Zixi ZHU
;
Jiana SUN
;
Yuan TIAN
;
Wei WANG
Author Information
1. 天津医科大学肿瘤医院放疗科 国家恶性肿瘤临床医学研究中心 天津市恶性肿瘤临床医学研究中心 天津市肿瘤防治重点实验室，天津 300060
- Keywords:
Intraoperative radiotherapy;
Low energy X-ray radiotherapy unit;
Radiation protection;
Shielding design
- From:
Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection
2022;42(8):629-635
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To assess the shielding requirements of low energy X-ray intraoperative radiotherapy room under the domestic and foreign standards and guidelines, to measure the sured transmission factors for a range of shielding materials, the ambient dose equivalent rate around concerned positions and the shielding effect of protective devices, so as to provide references for shielding design of such radiotherapy units and applications of radiological protection devices.Methods:The required shielding thicknesses for a treatment room with INTRABEAM intraoperative radiotherapy system were calculated under the Chinese national standard GBZ 121, IPEM report No. 75 and NCRP report No. 151, respectively. The transmission factors for a range of shielding materials including solid water slab, shielding sheet and shielding apron were measured. Moreover, the ambient dose equivalent rates were measured under the simulated working conditions and the shielding effectiveness of a lead screen was evaluated.Results:The required lead thicknesses calculated under different standards and guidelines were less than 0.6 mm for all the concerned points, with the differences at sub-millimeter level. The low energy X-rays generated by this equipment attenuated rapidly in the shielding materials. The measured transmission factors of 0.05 mm lead equivalent shielding sheet and 0.25 mm lead equivalent shielding apron were 0.068 and 0.003 8, respectively. When the radiation was delivered using spherical applicator without any attenuation, the ambient dose equivalent rates at 1 m and 2 m from the X-ray source were 10.7 and 2.6 mSv/h, respectively. The corresponding measurement values decreased to 3.8 and 0.9 μSv/h, respectively, when the spherical applicator was inserted into a small water tank. Meanwhile, the ambient dose equivalent rate at 2 m was reduced to the background level when using protective screen.Conclusions:The shielding requirements for a low energy X-ray intraoperative radiotherapy facility are minimal, with low effective energy of X-rays generated by this equipment, but the dose rate close to the unshielded radiation source is high. The shielding scheme of treatment room should be optimized in design and the protective device should be used in a reasonable way.
