Application of the ArcherQA three-dimensional dose verification system in intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans for nasopharyngeal carcinoma
10.3760/cma.j.cn112271-20220409-00150
- VernacularTitle:ArcherQA三维剂量验证系统在鼻咽癌调强放疗计划中的应用
- Author:
Penghui WANG
1
;
Shuai GONG
;
Shouliang DING
;
Lu YANG
;
Meng WANG
;
Xi PEI
;
Xiaoyan HUANG
;
Hongdong LIU
Author Information
1. 青岛大学医学院附属青岛市市立医院放疗中心，青岛 266011
- Keywords:
ArcherQA;
Three-dimensional dosimetric verification;
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma;
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy
- From:
Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection
2022;42(8):598-604
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the feasibility of applying the ArcherQA three-dimensional (3D) dosimetric verification system in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted for 105 NPC patients′ IMRT plans developed using the Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS). Dose verification was conducted using the ArcherQA system and through portal dosimetry (PD). Moreover, this study compared γ passing rates (criteria: 3 mm/3%, TH = 10%) between ArcherQA and PD and the doses delivered to the target volume ( Dmean, D90%) and organs at risk (OARs) ( Dmean) between ArcherQA and TPS, and analyzed the 3D γ passing rates of each organ at risk calculated by ArcherQA. Results:The average 3D γ passing rate calculated by ArcherQA was (99.04±1.01)%, and the average 2D γ passing rate measured by PD was (99.49±0.78)%, with statistically significant differences ( t=-3.35, P< 0.05). The dosimetric differences to the target volume between ArcherQA and TPS were as follows: the average difference in Dmean to the gross tumor volume (GTV) was (0.57±0.48)%, and the average difference in D90% was (0.65±0.56)%. For the target volume, the average γ passing rate was (97.67±3.43)% for GTV, (97.80±4.35)% for GTVnd-L, (97.82±4.07)% for GTVnd-R, (97.88±2.44)% for CTV1, and (96.64±4.32)% for CTV2. The mean dose difference of each target volume was CTV1 (0.57±0.46)%, GTVnd-L (0.85±0.55)%, GTVnd-R (0.73±0.55)%, and CTV2 (0.88±0.52)%. For OARs, the mean γ passing rate was (99.93±0.22)% for the brainstem, (99.17±2.82)% for the optic chiasm, (100±0)% for the lens, (99.56±1.05)% for the spinal cord, (99.00±2.06)% for the thyroid, and (87.86±10.42)% for the trachea. Statistically significant differences in the average doses to OARs were observed ( t=-14.62 to 4.82, P<0.05), except for those to the left optic nerve, the right hippocampus, and the right parotid gland. Conclusions:Based on the high-performance GPU platform and the Monte Carlo dose algorithm, ArcherQA can provide accurate 3D dose distribution and 3D γ passing rates inside patients according to CT images and provide the dose volume histogram (DVH) of various regions of interest (ROIs). Therefore, the ArcherQA three-dimensional dose verification system can be applied to IMRT plans for NPC. Moreover, it is inducive to improve the treatment efficiency since it does not occupy the accelerator operation time.
