Application of enhanced recovery after surgery in perioperative treatment of elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture in a primary hospital
10.3760/cma.j.cn115530-20220711-00364
- VernacularTitle:快速康复外科理念在基层医院老年股骨转子间骨折围手术期治疗中的应用效果
- Author:
Weifeng REN
1
;
Liefeng JI
;
Zhebiao CAO
Author Information
1. 绍兴市上虞人民医院关节创伤科，绍兴 312352
- Keywords:
Hip fractures;
Fracture fixation, intramedullary;
Bone nails;
Enhanced recovery after surgery;
Perioperative period
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
2022;24(9):819-823
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the efficacy of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in the perioperative treatment of elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture in a primary hospital.Methods:Retrospectively analyzed were the data of 104 elderly patients with intertrochanteric femoral fracture who had been treated by fixation with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) at Joint & Trauma Surgery, Shangyu People's Hospital of Shaoxing from January 2017 to January 2019. According to whether the ERAS concept was applied perioperatively, the patients were divided into 2 groups. In the ERAS treatment group of 53 cases, there were 27 males and 26 females with an age of (72.7±1.5) years. By the AO classification, 27 cases were type 31-A1, 16 cases were type 31-A2, and 10 cases were type 31-A3. Internal diseases were complicated in 37 cases. The time from injury to operation was (65.8±3.9) h. In the conventional treatment group of 51 cases, there were 31 males and 20 females with an age of (72.6±1.5) years. By the AO classification, 21 cases were type 31-A1, 19 cases were type 31-A2, and 11 cases were type 31-A3. Internal diseases were complicated in 37 cases. The time from injury to operation was (111.5±5.9) h. The postoperative pain visual analogue scale (VAS), hospital stay, complications, Harris hip score at the last follow-up, and one-year mortality were compared between the 2 groups.Results:Except for the time from injury to operation, there was no significant difference in the other preoperative general data between the 2 groups, showing comparability ( P>0.05). All the 104 patients were followed up for 12 to 24 months (average, 14.8 months) after operation. The VAS pain score [(3.2±1.2) points], hospital stay [(6.6±2.2) d], complication rate [5.7% (3/53)], and hip Harris score at the last follow-up [(90.7±1.3) points] in the ERAS treatment group were significantly better than those in the conventional treatment group [(3.9±1.0) points, (12.7±1.8) d, 19.6% (10/51), and (86.5±3.8) points] ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the one-year mortality between the ERAS treatment group [18.9% (10/53)] and the conventional treatment group [27.5% (14/51)] ( P>0.05). No such complications were followed up as injury to nerve or blood vessel, wound infection, fracture nonunion or femoral head necrosis in this cohort. Conclusion:In the perioperative treatment of elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture in a primary hospital, compared with conventional treatment, application of ERAS concept can shorten the patients' hospital stay, reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, achieve rapid recovery, and improve the patients' satisfaction.
